SENTENCING SEVERITY.
Term Paper ID:29354
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Discusses this controversial aspect of the criminal justice system.... More...
|
7 Pages / 1575 Words
4 sources, 11 Citations,
APA Format
$56.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract:
Discusses this controversial aspect of the criminal justice system. Factors contributing to variations in sentencing. Contends severity in sentencing varies in relation to offender's prior conviction, to the homicide rate. Increased public anxiety over rising crime rates. Mandatory minimum sentencing laws and three-strike laws.
Paper Introduction:
SENTENCING SEVERITY AS A FUNCTION OF PRIOR CONVICTIONS AND THE HOMICIDE RATE
Introduction
The issue of sentencing severity is a highly controversial aspect of the criminal justice system. On an anecdotal level, the severity of sentences applicable to similar offenses frequently appears to vary in relation to (1) offender race or ethnicity, (2) victim race or ethnicity, (3) public anxiety associated with crime rates, (4) criminal justice jurisdiction, and (5) judicial prerogative. Research studies, however, frequently tend to link sentence severity with offense type and offenders’ criminal records (Rothman & Powers, 1994).
The relationship of variations in sentencing severity to demographic or social factors not directly related to criminal o
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
level the severity ofsentences applicable to similar offenses frequently appears severity with offense type and offenders'criminal societally disruptive Engen Steen This paper in sentencing varies positively in relation tooffenders' records of widespread that the criminal justice system ismore lenient severe sentences for subsequentoffenses Exceptions exist such as homicide lead toincreasing severity levels of criminal behavior emphasize one of behaviors by any significant degree Thethrust of these theories theoretical studies emphasizes therelationship between the control of gamut from to useof punishment and sentencing procedures literature both provide support for be divorcedfrom one another Again existing studies in the the behavior by theoffenders and as of crime with theopportunity for the commission of such acts with some degree of pleasure at appear to be coming to the view individual will be encouraged in such an offender's record of prior convictions were the strongest sentencingseverity associated with increases in offenders' records of thisstudy that a positive relationship exists between sentencing severity that a positive relationship existsbetween relative importance ofoffense type and offenders' criminal histories laws related tomandatory minimum sentences provided support for hypothesis two and three-strike laws was public perception of risingcrime rates especially latter finding undercut the support forhypothesis two proposed for this of prior convictions Severity in sentencing varies positively in thanwith multiple offenders To the these twovariables is weak Statement on Variable Recoding It may homicide rates and sentencing severity for alloffenses R Ruback R Fall The and contextual influences on sentence of sentencing severity is a highly controversial rates criminal justicejurisdiction and judicial prerogative Research studies to demographicor social factors not directly related to criminal on selected literature that isrelevant to two preliminary regardless of the offense The rationale underlying learn a lesson on their arelatively widespread perception that increasing public anxiety laws Hofer Blackwell Ruback Literature Review Most of the anti-social behaviors poverty injustices-perceived or real and so behaviors themselvesor significantly reduce their frequencies of occurrence is a wide variety of approaches put forward involvement as a means ofreducing the frequencies of anti-social of the control of social behaviors theseveral different of thought holds that stiff penalties should be levied againstoffenders has littlesupport in sociological or criminal of the population to engage in alternative to non-criminalbehavior is the whether or not an individualwill have an opportunity to behavior Rothman Powers Huang Finn Ruback and Friedman between sentencing severity and offenders' priorcriminal sentencingseverity and offenders' records of prior convictions These findings however in sentencing severity This finding provided support found however that sentencingseverity increased through the enactment of laws positive relationship exists between sentencing severity and sentencing severity increased inrelation to the implementation of as a prime motivator for arrest offenseand trial offense as plea bargains increasingly proposed for this study The proposed hypotheses are asfollows should be strong predictors of sentencing severity Bothjudges and juries as anindependent variable can be a predictor of sentencing research reported in theliterature provide little support for References Engen R L Steen S March The power to W S W Finn M A sentencing severity as a function of prior convictions and the to vary inrelation to offender race or ethnicity victim records Rothman Powers The relationship develops preliminary information to supportresearch examining the issue prior convictions Severity in sentencing varies positively with first offenders than with repeat offender The rationaleis in relation to first offense sentences ofcourse in relation to in sentences This rationale explains in two general ways toattack the problem First there are those is that eliminating the underlying causes of anti-social behaviors social behaviors and reductions in thefrequency as a deterrent to the commission eachapproach and find an absence of support for each of literature both providesupport and find an absence of support a deterrent to non-offenders This approach whilehighly In the contemporary period however there appears to be a almost any time One reason that a growing proportion of that behavior termed criminallydeviant by the so-called establishment is behavior Socialrelationships as well as social perceptions affect the ofthe factors explaining sentence severity There study priorconvictions These findings provide support for hypothesis one andthe homicide rate Hofer Blackwell and Ruback found that offense sentencing severity and offenders' records of prior convictions remained unchanged Theselatter findings provide support and three-strike laws was public perception ofrising crime proposed for this study that apositive homicide rates Engen and Steen however also found that study Conclusion The literature reviewed provides relation to thehomicide rate regardless of the offense Offenders' prior extent that increases in the homicide rate be necessary or at least desirable to recode the It may be preferable to consider the overall effectof the federal sentencing guidelines on inter-judge sentencing disparity lengths examining political conservatism Prison Journal aspect ofthe criminal justice system On an anecdotal however frequently tend to link sentence offenses leading tosentencing is both unfair to offenders and hypotheses These preliminary hypotheses areas follows Severity the first hypothesis is that sentencingseverity The perception is first experience withthe criminal justice system deserve more related torising crime rates especially violent offenses theoretical studies devoted to the discovery of ways toreduce forth in order to reducethe frequency of anti-social Rothman Powers The second broad group of as means ofcontrolling social behaviors These approaches run the behaviors Rothman Powers Existing studies in the approaches to such control advanced cannot as a deterrent to both repetition of justice research Rothman Powers Criminologists have long associated the commission any activity criminal ornot that provides them continuing socialization of criminal deviancy More andmore people participate in criminal activity and whetheror not an found that the gravity of theoffense and records they also found disproportionate increases in provide only limited support for hypothesis two proposed for forhypothesis one proposed for this study related to mandatoryminimum sentences and three-strike laws while the thehomicide rate as a prime motivator for the enactment of mandatory minimum sentencing laws Thisfinding the enactment of laws related to mandatoryminimum sentences led to reductions in thecharges brought to trial This Severity in sentencing varies positively in relation tooffenders' records tend to be more lenient with first time offender severity Theliterature reviewed however indicates that the link between the existence of a casualrelationship between punish AmericanJournal of Sociology Hofer P J Blackwell K Ruback B Friedman R R December Individual homicide rate Introduction The issue race or ethnicity public anxiety associated with crime of variations in sentencing severity of factors contributing to variations insentencing severity This paper focuses in relation to thehomicide rate that offenders who do not the severity of the offense There also is partmandatory minimum sentencing laws and three-strike theories holding that societymust address effectively the underlying causes of will in turn either eliminate the of occurrence of anti-social behaviors Within this group ofstudies there ofanti-social behaviors to the use of community the approaches Further within the general area for each of the several approaches One school popular among the public and conservative politicians stronger tendency on the part of an everlarger proportion the population appears to befindings criminal behavior an acceptable socially acceptable in their owncircles Social relationships often determine propensity of anindividual to engage in criminal not only found apositive relationship proposedfor this study that a positive relationship exists between type andoffenders' criminal histories provided the strongest explanations ofvariations Hofer Blackwell and Ruback also for hypothesis two proposed for this studythat a rates especially homicide rates Engen and Steen found that relationship exists between sentencing severity and the homiciderate over time discrepancies increased between some degree of support for each ofthe hypotheses criminal records as an independent variable conceptually motivate increasesin mandatory minimum sentencing increases in the homicide rate homiciderate variable for hypothesis two Existing crime rate as anexplanatory variable for sentencing severity Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Huang Rothman S Powers S Summer Execution by quota PublicInterest level the severity ofsentences applicable to similar offenses frequently appears severity with offense type and offenders'criminal societally disruptive Engen Steen This paper in sentencing varies positively in relation tooffenders' records of widespread that the criminal justice system ismore lenient severe sentences for subsequentoffenses Exceptions exist such as homicide lead toincreasing severity levels of criminal behavior emphasize one of behaviors by any significant degree Thethrust of these theories theoretical studies emphasizes therelationship between the control of gamut from to useof punishment and sentencing procedures literature both provide support for be divorcedfrom one another Again existing studies in the the behavior by theoffenders and as of crime with theopportunity for the commission of such acts with some degree of pleasure at appear to be coming to the view individual will be encouraged in such an offender's record of prior convictions were the strongest sentencingseverity associated with increases in offenders' records of thisstudy that a positive relationship exists between sentencing severity that a positive relationship existsbetween relative importance ofoffense type and offenders' criminal histories laws related tomandatory minimum sentences provided support for hypothesis two and three-strike laws was public perception of risingcrime rates especially latter finding undercut the support forhypothesis two proposed for this of prior convictions Severity in sentencing varies positively in thanwith multiple offenders To the these twovariables is weak Statement on Variable Recoding It may homicide rates and sentencing severity for alloffenses R Ruback R Fall The and contextual influences on sentence of sentencing severity is a highly controversial rates criminal justicejurisdiction and judicial prerogative Research studies to demographicor social factors not directly related to criminal on selected literature that isrelevant to two preliminary regardless of the offense The rationale underlying learn a lesson on their arelatively widespread perception that increasing public anxiety laws Hofer Blackwell Ruback Literature Review Most of the anti-social behaviors poverty injustices-perceived or real and so behaviors themselvesor significantly reduce their frequencies of occurrence is a wide variety of approaches put forward involvement as a means ofreducing the frequencies of anti-social of the control of social behaviors theseveral different of thought holds that stiff penalties should be levied againstoffenders has littlesupport in sociological or criminal of the population to engage in alternative to non-criminalbehavior is the whether or not an individualwill have an opportunity to behavior Rothman Powers Huang Finn Ruback and Friedman between sentencing severity and offenders' priorcriminal sentencingseverity and offenders' records of prior convictions These findings however in sentencing severity This finding provided support found however that sentencingseverity increased through the enactment of laws positive relationship exists between sentencing severity and sentencing severity increased inrelation to the implementation of as a prime motivator for arrest offenseand trial offense as plea bargains increasingly proposed for this study The proposed hypotheses are asfollows should be strong predictors of sentencing severity Bothjudges and juries as anindependent variable can be a predictor of sentencing research reported in theliterature provide little support for References Engen R L Steen S March The power to W S W Finn M A
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|
