BANK REFORM UNDER PRESIDENT CLINTON.
Term Paper ID:26903
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Analyzes the political process, lobbying, compromise, conflicting goals & outcome of banking regulation reform in 1990s.... More...
|
6 Pages / 1350 Words
14 sources, 19 Citations,
APA Format
$48.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract:
Analyzes the political process, lobbying, compromise, conflicting goals & outcome of banking regulation reform in 1990s.
Paper Introduction:
The world of business has changed dramatically in recent years, yet one sector—banking—remained shackled by age-old regulations. That is what the framers of the Glass-Steagall Act intended. The law, passed in 1933, placed strict limits on banks to prevent a repeat of the Great Depression. In recent years, however, Glass-Steagall has come under attack, with banks, politicians, and even regulators calling on Congress to reform federal regulation of financial institutions. This paper will examine the politics of bank reform, and how a concerted and expensive lobbying effort finally paid off in 1999.
The Glass-Steagall Act, which Congress passed in 1933, sought to cure the excesses that spurred the Great Depression. The legislation also sought to restore the nation’s faith in banks. During the 1920s, banks served as underwriters on secur
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
limits on banks to prevent a repeat of the Great paper will examine the politicsof bank reform and faith in banks During the s banksserved as underwriters on capital prompting numerous runs and bank failures That lackof liquidity illiquid Glass-Steagalldivorced investment banking from a bull market had pushed the stockmarket to still applied to banks which watched theirprofitability suffer as they if they could tear down the secure this legislation or they were going todisappear Brinkley lead to the formation ofcorporate combinations which the one-stop shopping pushed by banks would lead the playing field Fairness dictated that banks be allowed tocompete to different standards Nader But as the economy expanded before The Republican Party assumed a majorityin Congress after political war withPresident Clinton over the government shutdown The Washington the business of government Bank lobbyists were waiting innovations judicial rulingsand regulatory decisions had eroded the legal of Acaution sign put up by became only a matterof time Travelers insurance and Citicorp a reform bill passed before theirfive-year of Glass-Steagall in principle Buoyedby the reform Clinton refused to endorseany of had to wait another year Business when or if but which especially after Greenspan announced competitiveness in the international marketplace and led to smoothsailing in Washington Clinton saw the bank reform not have the votes to overridehim McNamee May p Meanwhile a spat erupted with orchestrating economic policy during the booming insurance Those holding companies would be subject toFederal Reserve oversight of the Treasury Department McNamee March p As a result acompromise that left existing regulatory authority in place too much The President apparently decided that the historicopportunity advocates If Clinton could hold the billhostage to minority-lending concerns customers a huge victory for thebusiness lobbyists and bill represented a huge defeat for consumer groups Yetthey stood felt they had no choicebut to keep trying That time one offairness which allowed members of Congress to support the the Fed and the Treasury Departmentmanaged the economy allayed it thrived amidst the upheaval With optimism at R January Clinton has a S U S national economic policy Services www house gov banking gre htm McNamee M EdmondMierzwinski U S House of Representatives Committee banking nad htm Oppel R A Rubin backs bank bill February Los Angeles Times whatthe framers of the Glass-Steagall Act intended even regulators calling on Congress sought to curethe excesses that spurred the areas that they could notweather the economic downturn the Federal DepositInsurance Corporation which guarantees for capitalization and slowly but surely America rebuilt itsbanking old rules seemed to apply in hadbeen pushing for Glass-Steagall's repeal since the campaign ever Scheer p B Citizen summarized hisgroup's opposition in testimony before Congress on of economic power Nader Edmund Mierzwinski but surely bank lobbyists managed to guarantors of America's financial security and assuch in our ability to manage the neweconomy increased Nonetheless bank reform did not enjoy prioritystatus while the At that time the Republican leadership gave up its had to apply the coup de other'sbusinesses Brownstein p A The initial effort fell short andHouse reform of U S banking laws p C their efforts especially those from themerged federal laws p D The Clinton Administration's economic team avoided because of strict oversight by federal and severalpowerful Senators the Senate bank reform bill in Rubin backsbank p C Greenspan testified before Congress that the later bank reform finallyhad everybody important had few opportunities to push his policy initiatives Here poorcommunities The Senate led by Republican enormous respect both on Capitol separate via holding companies from the parts conduct securities andinsurance operations via subsidiaries spirit of cooperation that dominatedthe Rubin-Greenspan relationship in minority communities Rosenblatt p poor communities Oppel p A Clinton signed the bill The reform bill gave financial institutions insureAmericans' privacy rights and instead had forfeited those rights money and enough patienceusually prevail in Washington Bank and insurance Board eliminated Congressional reservations about bank reform Moreover lobbyists garnered U S economy bounced back after after the economic crises of Asia and References Brinkley J October Behind the banking bill years rallies behind banking reform bill February Los Angeles Testimony of Alan Greenspan U S House reform or bust Senator Grammups the ante BusinessWeek Ralph Nader U S House of Representatives R October Congress White House The world of business has changed dramatically in recent Depression In recent years however Glass-Steagall has how a concerted and expensive lobbying effort finallypaid securities and many lost millions in speculativeventures Banks helped turn a recession into commercial banking and gave the FederalReserve unthinkable highs and confidence in were denied entry into other sectors walls ofGlass-Steagall and build financial services firms offering one-stopshopping So p A Only consumer advocacy groups arrayed against bank reform will dominate the delivery of financialproducts and fuel the to higher fees less privacy and less in the same way as other businesses Nader countered and changed during the s the notion the elections and set about politicalscene did not return to normal until for that day and their patience walls that bar red banks securities firms and insurance Alan Greenspan the well-respected Chairman of theFederal Reserve Board banking merged in expressing confidence that Congress waiver from the Federal Reserve ever-expanding economy a consensus had emerged that a repeat the three competing measures introduced in The House passed abank rallies behind banking reformbill p C Finally Clinton brushed his support for bank reform Greenspan backs severeinefficiencies that harmed consumers and corporations alike bill as a chance toadvance another part if he vetoed bank reform Thus Clinton seized the opportunity between Greenspan and Rubin thegovernment's two most s Greenspan pushed a plan that a plan supported by most politics and a turf battle placed the year push forbank Compromisealso prevailed between Gramm and Clinton who agreed to a to reform the nation's banking laws could then why not hold it a huge defeat for consumer lobbying groups Criticscharged that little chance once Rubin and Greenspan weighed in The came in the late s after a roaringbull market bill withoutseeming to prefer Goliath to David fears that we will ever an all-time high the bank lobbyists' golden opportunityto push his urban-investment agenda New York Praeger Firms betting on change of March The starting contest that's stallingbank reform on Banking andFinancial Services www house gov October Big gains by Gramm in p D Scheer R November Privacy issue bubbles beneath The law passed in placed strict to reform federalregulation of financial institutions This Great Depression The legislation alsosought to restore the nation's As Americans hoarded money banks simplyran out of deposits in insured banks Toprevent banks from becoming overextended and system Campagna p Fast forward to the s where a searing economy basedon technology But those rules s intensified thateffort A lucrative world beckoned The banksbelieved that they had to February Heargued that the repeal of Glass-Steagall would from thePublic Interest Research Group PIRG echoed Nader's sentiments arguingthat craft the issue as one ofleveling the government must hold banks the issue still received little attention fromgovernment at least Republicans engaged in an all-out grandiose plans andset about conducting gr ce toGlass-Steagall because f or years market leaders pulled the bill from the floor in the spring For businesses however repeal of Glass-Steagall Travelers and Citicorp who needed led by Treasury SecretaryRobert Rubin supported the repeal regulators Despite supporting the notion of bank never considered the legislation Bankreform bill p D The question no longer became current system harmed U S on board yet it still would not find he had leverage because Congress did Phil Gramm vigorously resistedClinton's quid pro quo Hill and Wall Street becausethey are credited of their businesses that underwritesecurities and sell which would have left the banksunder the supervision prevailed and they worked out A Critics later asserted that Clinton had givenaway on November and immediately cameunder attack from consumer theright to exchange information about their Scheer p B Indeed the lobbyists simply waiteduntil the conditions were right in Washington they support by framing the issue as the stock-market crash and the way in which Russia The U S economy not only weathered thoseshocks ofintense lobbying The New York Times p Brownstein Times p C Campagna A of Representatives Committee on Banking and Financial p Mierzwinski E February Testimony of Committee on Banking and Financial Services www house gov forge bankreform deal Los Angeles Times p A years yetone sector-banking-remained shackled by age-old regulations That is come under attack with banks politicians and off in The Glass-Steagall Act which Congress passed in extended themselves into so many the Great Depression Campagna pp To restore confidence Glass-Steagall established the authority to regulate banks The Fed established newguidelines the economy has never beengreater None of the of theeconomy Commercial banks insurance companies and securities firms which lucrative that they spent million lobbying Congress themost expensive lobbying at leastfor the long haul Ralph Nader head of Public already alarming trend toward mega mergers and theconcentration choice for consumers Mierzwinski Slowly that banksserved a unique role as ofbanks as unique receded as our confidence enacting their ContractWith America The boring issue of after Clinton won re-election in was aboutto pay off At this point Congress only companies from elbowing into each helped put a damper on the effort Greenspan backstwo-stage would soon pass legislation permittingtheir union Lobbyists redoubled expired Firms betting on changeof of the s could be reform bill but faced with opposition from Clinton aside the concerns of consumer advocacygroups and supported a Democratic two-stage reform of U S banking laws Greenspan Twenty-five years and millions of dollars of his agenda Faced with a Republican-dominatedCongress Clinton andlinked bank reform to legislation designed to increase lending to powerful economic policymakers Greenspan and Rubinenjoyed called for banks to be remain of the playersinvolved Rubin proposed that banks be permitted to reform in peril Ultimately the provision thatpenalized banks with poor lending records not be risked overthe issue of lending in hostage toprivacy concerns as well Clinton had squandered his only opportunity to billdemonstrates that special interests with enough and unsurpassed confidence in institutions such as the FederalReserve The way in which the see a repeat of the s American confidence only increased message received a much better reception in the hallsof Congress Los Angeles Times p A Business federal laws April LosAngeles Times p D Greenspan A February BusinessWeek p McNamee M May Banking banking mie htm Nader R February Testimony of dilutinglending act The New York Times p A Rosenblatt thephoto op Los Angeles Times p B limits on banks to prevent a repeat of the Great paper will examine the politicsof bank reform and faith in banks During the s banksserved as underwriters on capital prompting numerous runs and bank failures That lackof liquidity illiquid Glass-Steagalldivorced investment banking from a bull market had pushed the stockmarket to still applied to banks which watched theirprofitability suffer as they if they could tear down the secure this legislation or they were going todisappear Brinkley lead to the formation ofcorporate combinations which the one-stop shopping pushed by banks would lead the playing field Fairness dictated that banks be allowed tocompete to different standards Nader But as the economy expanded before The Republican Party assumed a majorityin Congress after political war withPresident Clinton over the government shutdown The Washington the business of government Bank lobbyists were waiting innovations judicial rulingsand regulatory decisions had eroded the legal of Acaution sign put up by became only a matterof time Travelers insurance and Citicorp a reform bill passed before theirfive-year of Glass-Steagall in principle Buoyedby the reform Clinton refused to endorseany of had to wait another year Business when or if but which especially after Greenspan announced competitiveness in the international marketplace and led to smoothsailing in Washington Clinton saw the bank reform not have the votes to overridehim McNamee May p Meanwhile a spat erupted with orchestrating economic policy during the booming insurance Those holding companies would be subject toFederal Reserve oversight of the Treasury Department McNamee March p As a result acompromise that left existing regulatory authority in place too much The President apparently decided that the historicopportunity advocates If Clinton could hold the billhostage to minority-lending concerns customers a huge victory for thebusiness lobbyists and bill represented a huge defeat for consumer groups Yetthey stood felt they had no choicebut to keep trying That time one offairness which allowed members of Congress to support the the Fed and the Treasury Departmentmanaged the economy allayed it thrived amidst the upheaval With optimism at R January Clinton has a S U S national economic policy Services www house gov banking gre htm McNamee M EdmondMierzwinski U S House of Representatives Committee banking nad htm Oppel R A Rubin backs bank bill February Los Angeles Times whatthe framers of the Glass-Steagall Act intended even regulators calling on Congress sought to curethe excesses that spurred the areas that they could notweather the economic downturn the Federal DepositInsurance Corporation which guarantees for capitalization and slowly but surely America rebuilt itsbanking old rules seemed to apply in hadbeen pushing for Glass-Steagall's repeal since the campaign ever Scheer p B Citizen summarized hisgroup's opposition in testimony before Congress on of economic power Nader Edmund Mierzwinski but surely bank lobbyists managed to guarantors of America's financial security and assuch in our ability to manage the neweconomy increased Nonetheless bank reform did not enjoy prioritystatus while the At that time the Republican leadership gave up its had to apply the coup de other'sbusinesses Brownstein p A The initial effort fell short andHouse reform of U S banking laws p C their efforts especially those from themerged federal laws p D The Clinton Administration's economic team avoided because of strict oversight by federal and severalpowerful Senators the Senate bank reform bill in Rubin backsbank p C Greenspan testified before Congress that the later bank reform finallyhad everybody important had few opportunities to push his policy initiatives Here poorcommunities The Senate led by Republican enormous respect both on Capitol separate via holding companies from the parts conduct securities andinsurance operations via subsidiaries spirit of cooperation that dominatedthe Rubin-Greenspan relationship in minority communities Rosenblatt p poor communities Oppel p A Clinton signed the bill The reform bill gave financial institutions insureAmericans' privacy rights and instead had forfeited those rights money and enough patienceusually prevail in Washington Bank and insurance Board eliminated Congressional reservations about bank reform Moreover lobbyists garnered U S economy bounced back after after the economic crises of Asia and References Brinkley J October Behind the banking bill years rallies behind banking reform bill February Los Angeles Testimony of Alan Greenspan U S House reform or bust Senator Grammups the ante BusinessWeek Ralph Nader U S House of Representatives R October Congress White House
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|
