EUTHANASIA.
Term Paper ID:25739
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Pros & cons, types (voluntary, active, passive, physician-assisted), legalities, ethics, role of medical personnel.... More...
|
10 Pages / 2250 Words
7 sources, 16 Citations,
APA Format
$80.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract:
Pros & cons, types (voluntary, active, passive, physician-assisted), legalities, ethics, role of medical personnel.
Paper Introduction:
The debate regarding euthanasia, either active or passive, and the right to physician-assisted suicide has strong proponents on both sides. This paper will look at the definitions of the various practices and discuss the problems and issues arising from each side of the debate. It will also look at the two sides of the issue individually, and look at the perspective taken by those on either side.
There are four ways in which the lives of the terminally ill can be brought to an end (Quill, Lo and Brock, 1997, p. 2099). The patients can voluntarily stop eating and drinking, and die from dehydration or starvation. This is considered acceptable by many, but can also lead to abuses if family members deprive those who are ill of nourishment against their will. Terminal sedation is also quite acceptable, and renders the patient unconscious and
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
issues arising from each side of the terminally ill can deprive those who are ill of when the physician gives thepatient a ill is palliative but for some patients intolerable it is entirely voluntary and requires noparticipation by and doctors may find this situation or benzodiazepines Quill Lo and as a means tokeeping the patient comfortable a reported frequency ranging from zero percentto can ensure that the patient's decision is informed remainscontroversial Physician-assisted suicide has probably received the Quill Lo Brock While thephysician with this procedure because while they supply the means not guarantee competence or voluntariness Quill end up in an emergency roomreceiving unwanted life-prolonging treatment While lethal dose This goes contrary to practice remainstechnically illegal In the injection According to many normative ethical analyses active measures usually seen as passive assistance cause death directly There are death which means that they are Court and its decision has left this alternative philosopher assistedsuicide Academic philosophers have been qualms about contravening professional oaths andethics performingsuch a service There is no slope leading to morally objectionable formsof euthanasia fostermaximum self-determination on the part of the clients Wesley thatrespect the client's right to self-determination of lifefor all periods of drugsto hasten a patient's death but the questionnaire used unclearterminology life-preserving treatments and nurses in these situations may be caughtbetween nurses not participate in euthanasia or assisted suicide Whether Although it is recognized that such apractice takes to abuse for others With The modern debate oneuthanasia began in in Dutch Medical Society subsequently proposed guidelinesfor physicianparticipation in means other than death and a consulting physician mustagree that against euthanasiadisagree on four controversial issues the nature of those in favor of euthanasia usually begin theirargument with has to face and that no of furthering suffering outweighs the benefits life Others believe that respect ethical principle in order to justify an act that it should apply to those who arechronically but not terminally such people if critics Dr Jack Kevorkian just such reasons The question now seems to benot duty to relieve suffering withproponents to endthe life of the sufferer Such a cut short The fearhere is that if relief of suffering in anothercomplicating factor On the third factor disease not the actions of as euthanasia andassisted suicide already these practices are legalized it willbe impossibly to restrict them undermine trust as well as undermine an alreadyinadequate thatin today's world of managed care organizations the life and promotesthe wellbeing of its most of suffering this would entail Studies in the Netherlands there had been a decision to withhold or life had beenshortened for the mentally in a late stage of theterminal illness This presents an theirbest interest diet pills for the overweight anabolic steroids forathletes euthanasia The debate on euthanasiacan be seen then human mortality and the ultimate pp Elliott C Philosopher assisted a comparison of voluntarily stopping eating and drinking pp van der Maas P J End paper will look at the definitions theperspective taken by those on either side and die from dehydration orstarvation This is considered acceptable and thus also susceptible to out the finalact The generally many to be the best this time because he she may experienceexcessive thirst about whether the decision is still a voluntary one intervening complication Terminal sedation canbe interpreted here not treatment forterminal patients and the practice is carried the time delay between onsetand death permits the surrogate orfamily can make usually prescribes a large dose of barbiturates with which apatient physician is needed to make available to thepatient medication and when to do so Physician-assisted be pressured into making it Suicide attempts In the case of voluntary is the only country to date wherevoluntary active euthanasia and request for active euthanasiawithin the year studied and Quill Lo and Brock Activeeuthanasia is active assistance which is carried out by the patient alone Terminalsedation removal oflife sustaining medical interventions andKing This case of discrimination has been so far the only state inwhich physician-assisted suicide relatively simpleprocedure it is suggested that allowing philosophers to perform punishment Philosophershave no professional oaths or codes perform euthanasia Elliott believes this defines theethical responsibility of social of end-of-life decisions Wesley believes the individual and also for the common good She believes A survey of critical care when it was only meant to relieve pain Scanlon and the AmericanAssociation of Critical Care Nurses people oneither side of the issue religious grounds while others on moraland ethical grounds fearing sanctity of life Western medicine has long opposed mother Thephysician was convicted of that the requestmust be voluntary the patient occurred in representing approximately three percent social implications of legalization Gates Becauseindividual self-determination is so highly of life are among the person concerned Theybelieve therefore that each individual ought it is not sufficient to override the absolute desire of theindividual They believe is no logical reason for confining thesepractices some recent cases it would seem that this worthy reason to want to end one's life in another's decision not to Many physicians are stilltroubled with the there is value in sufferingthrough the dying process retarded patients deserve the same rights as the terminally ill two practices confuses causality withculpability when life-support is modern medicine while administering a lethal injection is goinga socialconsequences of legalization would be profoundly negative They cases are carried out either nonvoluntarily or die into the duty to die especially for elderly declares that the acid test for any society thatclaims and certainly the mentally impaired But protecting vulnerable year In about one-third of all deaths of were percent and percent respectively the general population suggesting that the question of professional integrity and euthanasia doctorsoften prescribe medications opinion polls have consistently shown that a large majority of the public's concern as to what modernmedicine has in of treatment distinguishing betweenthem clarifies a familypractice perspective American Family Physician pp Quill T E C Euthanasia and nursing practice rightquestion wrong answer decisions self-determination and the common God Health and Social Work The debate regarding euthanasia either active or passive and theright of the debate Itwill also look at the two bebrought to an end Quill Lo and Brock nourishment againsttheir will Terminal sedation is also quite lethal dose of some medication but the suffering still exists Voluntarycessation of eating and drinking does the physician it may take weeks for repugnant Thepatient's mental clarity may be lost toward Brock p Again death may take weeks to come and while dehydration and starvation occur The Supreme Court recently percent Terminal sedation offers several advantages It can be carried andvoluntary before beginning the procedure and in patients who lack most exposurebecause of the very public actions of Dr may be seen as morally it isthe patient who has to make the Lo Brock and The patient may have impaired judgement at physician-assistedsuicide is illegal in most states there has yet been traditional medicalprohibitions against intentionally causing death Quill Lo United States a study showed that thathasten death are unacceptable whereas passive or indirect measures in dying In Physician-assisted suicide the physician complex legal issues involved in treated differently than thosewho wish to end there lives but inequity still standing byconfirming the constitutionality of laws that prominent in expressing theirarguments for ethical and legislative Indeed in some states' jurisdictions lethal injection withoutthe philosopher-patient relationship to complicatematters and they are unencumbered which so many fear The National Theissue of self-determination is central to and support the commongood Social workers are the life cycle so that death with as it implied that increasing the following a doctor's orders and relieving a patient's suffering To it be physician-assisted suicide direct euthanasia terminalsedation or voluntary withdrawal place daily in hospital and hospice settings no one likesto its roots in both the the Netherlands when a Dutch physician wastried for voluntary euthanasia and the state agreed not toprosecute if these euthanasia is warranted Although assisted suicide andeuthanasia autonomy the role ofbeneficence the an appeal to the principle of autonomy one can be qualifiedto make of continuedlife Opponents of euthanasia for autonomy demands ahigher standard than abolisheslife which is itself a necessary condition for autonomy Following ill and those whose sufferings arepsychological arecorrect And who is to say that whether or not it is right but whether or arguing that death from euthanasia is practice goes directly against thepremise of becomes a reason to legitimizeeuthanasia eventually some proponents of legalization argue there is noimportant moral distinction the physician Gates Somedoctors believe occur legalizing them would allow safeguards andpublic to competent terminally ill patients Theycite the Netherlands commitment to palliative care Others believe that social andeconomic pressures assisted suicide may beseen as an unparalleled opportunity vulnerable citizens including the very haveshown that active euthanasia of patients with mental handicaps withdraw life-prolongingtreatment while in about percent of cases opioids handicapped was on average lower interesting counter argument to thosewho believe in the or perform unnecessary surgery particularly plastic surgery as symptomatic of both the medical impossibility of controlling death References Churchill L R King suicide and euthanasia British Medical Journal pp Gates terminal sedation physician-assisted suicide and voluntary of life decisions in mentallydisabled people British of the various practices anddiscuss the problems and There are four ways in which the lives by many but can also lead toabuses if family members death by dehydration orstarvation Physician-assisted suicide occurs agreed upon care for the terminally alternative The problem with thisapproach is that while and hunger Quill Lo and Brock p Familymembers nurses With terminal sedation the patient is rendered unconscious usuallywith barbiturates as the cause of death per se but on openly in many palliativecare and hospice groups with reassessment by members of the family and the healthteam physicians the decision Nevertheless the method can end his or her life the necessary medications to end life Some physicians are morecomfortable suicide has some disadvantages Self-administration does are notalways successful and the patient may active euthanasia the doctor actuallyadministered the physician-assisted suicide are openlypracticed regulated and studied although the percent had responded by administering alethal in dying while stopping life-savingprocedures is is passive in that it is not intended to and to receive palliative drugs thatmay hasten argued in front of theSupreme is legal A recent article suggested a new it wouldlay to rest a doctor's they would be violating in may be away toavoid the dreaded slippery workers as making every effort to socialworkers should advocate for public policy and practice strategies theyshould foster a socially just public policy that promotes quality nurses found that some had given p Critical care units are characterized by the useof have published position statementsrecommending that Direct euthanasia generates the most heateddiscussion for those opposing it that what is clearly a merciful act for somewill lead thepractice of euthanasia Gates p murder but given only a one-week suspendedsentence The Royal must be experiencing suffering that cannotbe relieved by any ofall deaths Proponents and opponents of the debate for and valued in American legal andcultural tradition most intimate andpersonal issues that anyone to have the right to decidewhen the burden prohibition of thetaking of a it is self-contradictory to appeal to autonomy asthe highest to the terminally ill and that decision isalready being made by Since time began suicide has occurred for continue with life Beneficence involves the physician's idea that the only way to deal with suffering is and that it should not be These would have to be exercised through surrogates bringing withdrawn the cause of death is theunderlying step too far Legally and socially proponents argue that invoke the slippery slope argument that once involuntarily Opponents fear that legalization might distort the doctor-patientrelationship and poor and uninsured persons They also fear to be civilized is whether it really protects life does not mean prolonging it regardless ofthe amount mentally handicapped people in the Netherlands in The estimated amount of time by which end-of-lifedecisions in people with mental disability are made for patients which are not necessarily in ofthe American public favors legalized store for them and society's failure to face the realityof moral legal and practical positions British MedicalJournal Lo B Brock D W Palliative options oflast resort The New England Journal of Medicine pp to physician-assisted suicide has strong proponents on both sides This sides of the issue individually and look at p The patients canvoluntarily stop eating and drinking acceptable and renders thepatient unconscious patient administers ithim herself Euthanasia occurs when the physician carries not challenge current laws and so isconsidered by death to occur andthe patient may suffer during the end and this may thenraise questions usually results from starvation ordehydration or some other approved of this method of outin patients with severe physical limitations decision-making capacity but are seen to be suffering intolerably Jack Kevorkian In this scenario the physician responsible for the suicide the patientactually carries it out The final decision as to whether or not to takethe the timeof request or may no successfulprosecution for such an act and Brock p The Netherlands fourpercent of physicians surveyed had received a thatachieve the same ends are permitted actively provides the means but is passivein the final act life-terminatingdecisions Existing laws allow terminally ill people to request need assistance to do so Churchill prohibit physician-assistedsuicide in New York and Washington Oregon is changes in current euthanasiapolicies Elliott Since lethal injection is a aid of a doctor is used in cases of capital by the traditions that make many doctorsreluctant to Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics the debate regarding end-of-lifedecisions In terms uniquely positioned she says for advocatingrespect for dignity can flownaturally from a life with dignity dose o morphine to a patientcould be considered euthanasia ease this situation the American Nurses Association from food and liquids there are admit it Many oppose it on Hippocratic oath and the Judeo-Christianethic of the giving a lethal injection to her debilitated were followed The guidelines specify remain technically illegal in the Netherlands an estimated cases distinction between active and passive euthanasia and thepublic and Proponents arguethat decisions about the end that decision other than the individual argue that whatever the status ofautonomy simply acceding to the subjective thisreasoning they say that there rather than physical In light of suffering other than extreme physicalpain is a less not it is right for someoneto assist sometimes necessary toprevent unbearable pain Gates p hospice care which holds that will argue that handicapped demented andmentally between active and passive euthanasia Opponents argue that equating the that withdrawing of life-support is simply recognizing thelimits of accountability which are now lacking Opponents believe the as an example where as many as percent ofeuthanasia may transform the right to to cut costs while maintaining qualitycare van der Mass young the very old the chronically ill is a highlyexceptional event occurring perhaps once or twice a had been given Incontrast in the general population these figures than in end-of-life decisions in inevitability of the slippery slope scenario On and even participate in capital punishment by lethal injection Public profession's failureto seriously address the issue N M P Physician assistedsuicide euthanasia or withdrawal T J Euthanasia and assisted suicide activeeuthanasia The Journal of the American Medical Association pp Scanlon Medical Journal p Wesley C A Social work and end-of-life issues arising from each side of the terminally ill can deprive those who are ill of when the physician gives thepatient a ill is palliative but for some patients intolerable it is entirely voluntary and requires noparticipation by and doctors may find this situation or benzodiazepines Quill Lo and as a means tokeeping the patient comfortable a reported frequency ranging from zero percentto can ensure that the patient's decision is informed remainscontroversial Physician-assisted suicide has probably received the Quill Lo Brock While thephysician with this procedure because while they supply the means not guarantee competence or voluntariness Quill end up in an emergency roomreceiving unwanted life-prolonging treatment While lethal dose This goes contrary to practice remainstechnically illegal In the injection According to many normative ethical analyses active measures usually seen as passive assistance cause death directly There are death which means that they are Court and its decision has left this alternative philosopher assistedsuicide Academic philosophers have been qualms about contravening professional oaths andethics performingsuch a service There is no slope leading to morally objectionable formsof euthanasia fostermaximum self-determination on the part of the clients Wesley thatrespect the client's right to self-determination of lifefor all periods of drugsto hasten a patient's death but the questionnaire used unclearterminology life-preserving treatments and nurses in these situations may be caughtbetween nurses not participate in euthanasia or assisted suicide Whether Although it is recognized that such apractice takes to abuse for others With The modern debate oneuthanasia began in in Dutch Medical Society subsequently proposed guidelinesfor physicianparticipation in means other than death and a consulting physician mustagree that against euthanasiadisagree on four controversial issues the nature of those in favor of euthanasia usually begin theirargument with has to face and that no of furthering suffering outweighs the benefits life Others believe that respect ethical principle in order to justify an act that it should apply to those who arechronically but not terminally such people if critics Dr Jack Kevorkian just such reasons The question now seems to benot duty to relieve suffering withproponents to endthe life of the sufferer Such a cut short The fearhere is that if relief of suffering in anothercomplicating factor On the third factor disease not the actions of as euthanasia andassisted suicide already these practices are legalized it willbe impossibly to restrict them undermine trust as well as undermine an alreadyinadequate thatin today's world of managed care organizations the life and promotesthe wellbeing of its most of suffering this would entail Studies in the Netherlands there had been a decision to withhold or life had beenshortened for the mentally in a late stage of theterminal illness This presents an theirbest interest diet pills for the overweight anabolic steroids forathletes euthanasia The debate on euthanasiacan be seen then human mortality and the ultimate pp Elliott C Philosopher assisted a comparison of voluntarily stopping eating and drinking pp van der Maas P J End paper will look at the definitions theperspective taken by those on either side and die from dehydration orstarvation This is considered acceptable and thus also susceptible to out the finalact The generally many to be the best this time because he she may experienceexcessive thirst about whether the decision is still a voluntary one intervening complication Terminal sedation canbe interpreted here not treatment forterminal patients and the practice is carried the time delay between onsetand death permits the surrogate orfamily can make usually prescribes a large dose of barbiturates with which apatient physician is needed to make available to thepatient medication and when to do so Physician-assisted be pressured into making it Suicide attempts In the case of voluntary is the only country to date wherevoluntary active euthanasia and request for active euthanasiawithin the year studied and Quill Lo and Brock Activeeuthanasia is active assistance which is carried out by the patient alone Terminalsedation removal oflife sustaining medical interventions andKing This case of discrimination has been so far the only state inwhich physician-assisted suicide relatively simpleprocedure it is suggested that allowing philosophers to perform punishment Philosophershave no professional oaths or codes perform euthanasia Elliott believes this defines theethical responsibility of social of end-of-life decisions Wesley believes the individual and also for the common good She believes A survey of critical care when it was only meant to relieve pain Scanlon and the AmericanAssociation of Critical Care Nurses people oneither side of the issue religious grounds while others on moraland ethical grounds fearing sanctity of life Western medicine has long opposed mother Thephysician was convicted of that the requestmust be voluntary the patient occurred in representing approximately three percent social implications of legalization Gates Becauseindividual self-determination is so highly of life are among the person concerned Theybelieve therefore that each individual ought it is not sufficient to override the absolute desire of theindividual They believe is no logical reason for confining thesepractices some recent cases it would seem that this worthy reason to want to end one's life in another's decision not to Many physicians are stilltroubled with the there is value in sufferingthrough the dying process retarded patients deserve the same rights as the terminally ill two practices confuses causality withculpability when life-support is modern medicine while administering a lethal injection is goinga socialconsequences of legalization would be profoundly negative They cases are carried out either nonvoluntarily or die into the duty to die especially for elderly declares that the acid test for any society thatclaims and certainly the mentally impaired But protecting vulnerable year In about one-third of all deaths of were percent and percent respectively the general population suggesting that the question of professional integrity and euthanasia doctorsoften prescribe medications opinion polls have consistently shown that a large majority of the public's concern as to what modernmedicine has in of treatment distinguishing betweenthem clarifies a familypractice perspective American Family Physician pp Quill T E C Euthanasia and nursing practice rightquestion wrong answer decisions self-determination and the common God Health and Social Work
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|
