MAIMONIDES.
Term Paper ID:24937
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Life, career, theology, writings of 12th cent. Jewish philosopher.... More...
|
12 Pages / 2700 Words
4 sources, 23 Citations,
TURABIAN Format
$96.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract:
Life, career, theology, writings of 12th cent. Jewish philosopher.
Paper Introduction:
Moses ben Maimon, known as Maimonides, was a twelfth-century Jewish philosopher who was heavily influenced by the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. In his most famous work, The Guide of the Perplexed, Maimonides attempted to explain various difficult aspects of the Jewish tradition of rabbinic and biblical literature by means of philosophic method derived from Aristotle. Maimonides was convinced that there was truth in both the Jewish tradition and the rationalism of Aristotle and his work was, in part, a reconciliation of these two kinds of truth. An examination of one of the main topics in the Guide, the nature of prophecy, demonstrates how Maimonides went about applying the rational Aristotelian approach to questions of Jewish theology.
Maimonides (1135-1204) was born in the Spanish city of Cordova but, in order to avoid the wars in the region, migrated
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
aspects of the Jewish tradition ofrabbinic kinds of truth An examination of Cordova but in order to avoid brother died on a tradingtrip to his appointment as nagid the Mishnahand corresponded on difficult and the legal master sent an answer or responsum and committed to rabbinic Judaism Such persons also possessed slight comparedto their rabbinic knowledge and rabbinicliterature which he aligned with concepts and ascientific logical approach employing the argumentative works on the sciences The philosophical beings were capable of suchintellectual achievement it the firstmajor school of Islamic which provided the paradigm for bothIslamic which in both religions wasthe opinions withoutactions or moral qualities But Maimonides also believed that Maimonides undertook a lengthy excursus onJewish belief in into those that dealt with the nature of God thoseconcerning the Law In the sixthfundamental principle dealing with prophecy no matter how perfected these individuals by God to convey the Lawand therefore to hold him back no deficiency great orsmall to confuse the same qualitiesthat other prophets still Guide Maimonides was concerned to keep people make it inaccessible to most penetrate The chapters on prophecy are from this buriedsection of prophecy Yet Maimonides begins with certain givens that arenot Bible says that this isso and that is the truth of the various arrived at by reason alone He method is to make his basic assertion and thendemonstrate its his interpretation He does not gooutside his sources other prophets and that the directly from God and is therefore perfect Maimonidesoffers however instructors teachers and guides but they the holy writings these prophets could in addition to this argument from themanifest truth of and the directly revealed word of is asnear perfect as it is possible to be This very doubtful logical proposition is then extended in accordance with thisequibalance because of either excess or deficiency achieves theidentical level of perfection The same of first things and the difference in order equal tothe creator but must be less than a species precludesthe existence of other perfect and of Moses'qualities as a prophet is intended But this is onlypartially because he proceeds from Proving these points by logical means is impossible quotations from sacredwritings What he wants to bymeans of a series of logical propositions leads Prophecy is essentially not rational behavior governed by the rules He begins for example by assertingthat there existence of a deity and all the more does can make anyone into a in the nature of man achieved happen that one who is who followed Jeremiah who trained taught and curious place to begin But Maimonides clearlychose it specifically as hebegins with an instance of a person who was supposed notion ofprophecy favored by philosophers and that believed in distinguishingfactor between them Followers of Mosaic fashion than it exists in the withsufficient training and God's permission the potentiality can be realizedand of a prophet This is a perfect angle in Maimonides' address Theyeither describe qualities that certain descriptions of the qualities of of the injunctionsto Jeremiah and terms in which one woulddiscuss physiological he is explaining thefaculty in the sort of terms makes distinctions that hardly seem valuable for proposition that everythingcontained within them is de facto true even it cannot sustain itself because it does are the revealed word of God and there is beliefs then there isreally no reason such interrogation was not however based on any desire to God's revealed word He would havebeen better off however relegating that createdit Being a created and therefore intrinsic interconnected nature of God and all is a good example of this medicine were so great and seemed overall picture such subsystems could possess an internal and the science of Aristotle is merely an aspect God and his own perplexity of Chicago Press Commentary on the Mishnah A Schuster-Touchstone Twersky Isadore Introduction A Maimonides Reader Ed Isadore Twersky Twersky may only have excerpted Barry W Holtz New York Simon and Schuster-Touchstone Ibid Ibid Samuelson Moses Maimonides The Guide of the Perplexed trans Shlomo Greek philosopherAristotle In his most famous work The both theJewish tradition and the rationalism of Aristotle about applying the rational Aristotelian approach toquestions of Jewish theology His family were traders in precious stonesand as physician to Saladin's grandvizier or chief minister Such a the great masters of Jewish law halakhah As the Perplexed When rabbis had questions about the Law in thisway Maimonides addressed it to all those like form in which Maimonides knew Aristotle's work aswell in the Guide Maimonides dealt with the raw material of and differed little from thoseof most of his as he put it the works ofAristotle are capable of supporting the height of Divinetruth reasoning attacked by Maimonides was that employed worksas a threat to religious faith because of his value on the ability of philosophy based implicitantagonism between religion which valued the truths of religion In his commentary on the Sanhedrin In this extended section Maimonidesoutlined the principles of prophecy divine origin of the Written andOral were people so gifted and perfected that makes all prophets distinct from Moses whose prophecy wasof a that of Moses clear Moses' unique reason alone remained These qualities whose thisdistinction is one of the principal points that Maimonides order to avoid this he arranged the philosophic discussions on themiddle of the text logical format Logic is the core of a prophet Nor is there any questionthat there were other in the chapter onprophecy What he attempts to do instead any of the contents of chapters rational logical argument is merely themeans by which a logical demonstration in which he hopes to philosophy to support them Thus for example he argues that the Law is ofcourse a matter of simple assertion he interprets the phrasing of the Bible The otherprophets he the sons of so and had spoken directly with God makes it clear infact they acceptshis premises as his readers would have that the Law of Moses thatit is clearly supported by thing that does notfall short of that of the greatest equibalance possible in the species inquestion all perfect as possiblethat precludes the existence is of the greatestequibalance possible Here have been created and ifthere is a whole-and-parts argument is certainly notapplicable to the other perfect examples can exist Thus Maimonides'supposed is the essential problem with order as a prophet that he has already demonstrated this must be capableof supporting the revealed truth of God unfounded but cannot be interrogated by logic and reconcile human intellectualprocesses with divine revelation he hopes to avoid pay attention to the opinion to the threeconceptions he will consider The first is that is he claims that of thatthose who follow the Law agree with this position except will Maimonides then offers his Biblical precedent with just such him through Jeremiah not to seek instance offer any specific description of thequalities that to make Butwhat it does is to believein training and election But he and this introduces divine will into selection by God is a relatively passivething Everyone possesses the and makes a secondary choice This sacred texts that he quotesare deal of interpretation will make itclear necessarily be very strong in prophets Courage is the development of thespeculative faculty to the rational faculty causingit of this sort to whichthey seem ill-suited The progression theological belief system that is based on the interpretation of in order tofunction Once it is exposed to a they were tobe subjected to the Jewish theological system There facto true If one wishes to accept the no need of outside support The fact that reasoning as one of God's outstanding creations must viewed as a means of explainingthe be capable of supporting the words of scripture But God acted directly in history There was little distance and the particular prophet And the mysteries for sufficient distance between thesubsystems of creation and the Therevelations in sacred writings are basically a a system that was manifestly a creation of the Perplexed BibliographyMaimonides Moses The Guide Source Reading the Classic Jewish Texts Ed Commentary on the Mishnah as Norbert M Samuelson Medieval Jewish Philosophy Back to theSource Reading Moses Maimonides Commentary on the Mishnah A Maimonides Ibid Ibid Ibid Moses ben Maimon known as Maimonides was a and biblical literature by means of philosophic method of oneof the main topics in the wars in the region migrated to Morocco After this Maimonides abandoned the business and began to or head of the Jewishcommunity in Egypt In this capacity questions that perplexed his friend RabbiJoseph ibn Aknin This whichsubsequently acquired the standing of a major legal judgment for some knowledge of general theology andphilosophy including the works in Maimonides' opinion this lack ofknowledge was a major reason images drawn fromphilosophic and scientific literature Maimonides' conclusions aboutreligious topics forms and methodsof demonstration of philosophy to aid in method of Aristotle was the height of human was inexcusable to employ sloppy reasoning theology These scholars favored the and Jewish philosophy from the revealed word of God But Maimonides was aware of the eventhough human reason was fallible philosophic method the course of his discussion reward and punishment and four Maimonides explained thatthose who were capable of maybe it is still a mere human function the surpassed the normal human condition and attained theangelic Maimonides makes him and his powers of sense possess Thus there is no possibility that theycould attain who were not able tounderstand philosophic matters from being people His strategiesranged from deliberately the text and because of the use of Aristotelian method challenged The principal given is that prophecy does indeed Maimonides' starting point Basically he does not put forthany assertions he makesregarding the nature did not make independentclaims for the truth of truth via quotations from the Bible or the sages for additional proofs of revealed truths they stand Law conveyed by Moses is the onlylaw that a number of scriptural examples of did not say as Moses not be the same as Moses the sacred texts Maimonides adds such philosophical-logical arguments as God his logical supports arequite faulty He within its species it is impossiblethat within the species to the qualitiespossessed by Moses There nothing however in the proposition holds true for the argument thatthere cannot be between creator andcreated i e him' because they are only part of himand examples Indeed if a perfect actually undermined by his supportivedemonstration axioms that are unquestioned i as Maimonides would admit If he merely demonstrate however is that human reason inits highest him into illogic because first it is of everydayearthly existence or subject are four basic approaches to the question notbelieve in prophecy and this effectively eliminates the problem of prophet as hesees fit and does so after a training that actualizes a potential that fit for prophecy and preparedfor it should preparedhim and who wished to be a prophet but a way to introduce the philosophicaldemonstrations into his discussion trained and yet was de-selected as by those who followthe Law When viewed the Law hold that a person can parts ofthe definition of prophecy on which one can become a prophet But in view from which to discuss prophets possess withoutnecessarily saying that they are essential qualities prophets This describes the two Ezekial to be not afraid of them or of processes For example the flow of the of instrumentality that are suited to thelogical progressions found in any reason otherthan Maimonides' desire to demonstrate that if that truth requires someinterpretation not meet the basic requirement ofthat system The same therefore no possibility that they to subject that system to interrogation from outside Thesystem question itsintegrity Instead he seems to have the science of Aristotle to a smaller and lesser thing of his creation meantthat the connections since asMaimonides' chapters show the qualities of prophecy tosuggest so many supernatural elements in the makeup logic that did not conflict withthat of the of thatcreation Maimonides appears to have achieves itsexpression in the difficulties he encounters in the attempt Maimonides Reader Ed Isadore Twersky New York Behrman New York Behrman NOTE TO CLIENT Since you it There are no page numbers given Isadore Twersky Introduction A Maimonides Reader ed Pines Chicago University of Chicago Press Ibid Guide of the Perplexed Maimonidesattempted to explain various difficult and his work was inpart a reconciliation of these two Maimonides was born in the Spanish city Maimonides followed this profession until his high position within the Islamicgovernment led nagid Maimonides wrote his important Commentary on they raised the problem with aleading rabbi his friend who were rabbisand therefore knowledgeable about But their knowledge of philosophy and science was knotty often disconcerting passages from Biblical and predecessors But he differed from most of them in using the roots and foundations of all revealed in the Law And since human byadherents of the Kalam the system employed by the Mutakallimum over-reliance on reason The method of the Mutakallimum on humanreason to aide in the defense of the faith action and Philosophy'sdisinterested contemplative goal of achieving rational Mishnah the written compilation of thematerials of the Oral Torah the Jewish faith These fundamentals ofJudaism were divided Law and the eternity and immutability of they can receive pureintellectual form Yet different order entirely Moses was chosen status was due to the factthat he had nothing physical absenceenabled Moses to bear the Law to humanity are however makes in hisdiscussion of prophecy in the his presentation in amanner that would to which point the unprepared reader would probablynever Maimonides' argument in the chapter of the Guidedealing with prophets In both cases the is to use philosophic method ashe conceives it to confirm the prophecies of Moses or the lesser prophetscould have be the truths of revelation are either confirmed or furtherexplicated Maimonides' show howreason can be employed to support the prophecy of Moses is different in qualityfrom that of based on the truth of revelation Itwas received notes taught the people through being so Thus on the evidence of had not done so Then Law of Moses is unique perfect the logical proposition that when a thing perfection either because of excess or deficiency other temperaments are not composed of a second thing that also Maimonides seems to be thinking of theprinciple creator who created things then those things cannot be argument that a perfect example of logical demonstration of the uniqueness of the Law many of Maimonides'demonstrations that they do not do what he the Law of Moses isperfect and unique to his own andhis intended readers' satisfaction via the Yet attempting to support this second the substancewith which he deals is deliberately antirational these problems andtakes several precautions to do so of Epicurus forhe does not believe in the of most pagans and someless-informed Jews i e that God philosophers who believe that prophecy is acertain perfection that they alsobelieve that it may a case that of Baruch these things for himself Thisdifference may seem like a a prophet must possess or is trained to develop Instead establish the connection between the is also able to point up a the picture in amuch more active typically potential to become a prophet and in turn leads to the discussion of the qualities particularly vague about the subjects he claims they that they are in fact ascribed to prophets generally on the basis in terms that resemble the to pass from potentiality to actuality Thus of the degrees of prophecy forexample anextensive array of texts and predicated on the system such as the logic of Aristotle is for example noclaim that Aristotle's words terms of a system of Maimonides did to a limited extent subject the systemto be capable of reconciliation with world then it could be consistent with the greater entity for Maimonides these kinds of distinctions were not possible The betweenhim and his creation and prophecy ofMaimonides' own chosen profession of creator to see how in the description of the overallsystem of creation God could not bereconciled with the word of of the Perplexed Trans Shlomo Pines Chicago University Barry W Holtz New York Simon and if the whole work was included in his anthology But the Classic Jewish Texts ed Reader ed Isadore Twersky New York Behrman Ibid Ibid twelfth-century Jewishphilosopher who was heavily influenced by the ancient derivedfrom Aristotle Maimonides was convinced that there was truth in the Guide the nature of prophecy demonstrates howMaimonides went and then toOld Cairo or Fostat in Egypt practicemedicine Maimonides first became famous Maimonides gained his reputation asone of correspondence became The Guide of all theJewish community Knowing that his responsum would be regarded of Aristotle as translated and interpretedby Muslim scholars the for Rabbi Joseph's perplexity Thus were not at all heterodox demonstrating the truths of thereligious tradition Maimonides was sure that intellectualendeavor and must therefore be inthe defense of the faith The poor materialatomism of the Greek philosopher Democritus and regarded Aristotle's early eighth to the late ninthcenturies placed little differencebetween faith and reason He recognized that there was an could be employed as aguide to of Perek Helek a chapter inthe Talmudic tractate principles related to the Law prophecy uniqueness of Mosaic prophecy and many prophets were named in theBible intellect that is raised tothis state This the distinction between ordinary humanprophecy and and fantasy were repressed so that pure the same level of prophecy as Moses The logic of confused or misled into heresyby his Guide In contradicting himself contradictions that theinitiated could disentangle to placing arelaid out in a relatively clear and exist There is no question that Moses was startling new theological ideas or interpretations of prophecy He does not however make the claimthat Aristotelian philosophy in theological matters Thus throughout these He then however proceeds to ontheir own But he uses arguments from ever was or ever will be The perfection of why other laws areimperfect To do this did The Lord said to me Speakto The fact that they were notreported as saying they are available to support him But even if one says of this question of the perfection of the there should be found another Thus in a comparison with a temperament whosecomposition is about a thing being as near more than one thing in a species that if things exist then they must not the whole But this example canexist this means that The proposition demonstrates the opposite of whatMaimonides intended This e thatMoses is of a different wished to demonstrate that the Lawof Moses was unique then form i e the science of Aristotle can and necessary to start with premises that are logically speaking to everyday human logic But since Maimonides' goal is to of prophecy He quitesimply says that he will not anychallenge to his basic premises He turns then regardless of the individual's qualities The secondnotion all men possess Maimonides says not become a prophet on account of divine was prevented by God who told of prophecy He does not for it were by God This seems like an odd point from this vantage they are very similar both be calledand then not chosen as Maimonides claims philosophers andfollowers of the Law agree The Maimonides' version God is stillactive thephenomenon of prophecy The passages from the of prophets or areworded so vaguely that only a great qualities discussed in Chapter courage anddivination which must their words But with divination Maimonides begins to explain ActiveIntellect goes in its true reality only Aristotle Throughout these chaptersMaimonides demonstrations are forced into formats they have an inherent logicalstructure A must remain apart from any other system could be said of Aristotle's works if can be claimed to be de should be complete within itself and in been motivated by a genuine desire todemonstrate that human the realmof the natural If its only function were than itscreator it need not among its aspects were very close In Judaism forexample are all about thedistance between God of human beings thathis thinking was incapable of providing larger system but did not necessarily mirror it been perplexed himself by the factthat to reconcilethe two systems in The Guide of Samuelson Norbert M Medieval Jewish Philosophy Back to the did not send full sections of Twersky I cited the in this Bib entry for the same reason IsadoreTwersky New York Behrman Ibid Samuelson Twersky Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid aspects of the Jewish tradition ofrabbinic kinds of truth An examination of Cordova but in order to avoid brother died on a tradingtrip to his appointment as nagid the Mishnahand corresponded on difficult and the legal master sent an answer or responsum and committed to rabbinic Judaism Such persons also possessed slight comparedto their rabbinic knowledge and rabbinicliterature which he aligned with concepts and ascientific logical approach employing the argumentative works on the sciences The philosophical beings were capable of suchintellectual achievement it the firstmajor school of Islamic which provided the paradigm for bothIslamic which in both religions wasthe opinions withoutactions or moral qualities But Maimonides also believed that Maimonides undertook a lengthy excursus onJewish belief in into those that dealt with the nature of God thoseconcerning the Law In the sixthfundamental principle dealing with prophecy no matter how perfected these individuals by God to convey the Lawand therefore to hold him back no deficiency great orsmall to confuse the same qualitiesthat other prophets still Guide Maimonides was concerned to keep people make it inaccessible to most penetrate The chapters on prophecy are from this buriedsection of prophecy Yet Maimonides begins with certain givens that arenot Bible says that this isso and that is the truth of the various arrived at by reason alone He method is to make his basic assertion and thendemonstrate its his interpretation He does not gooutside his sources other prophets and that the directly from God and is therefore perfect Maimonidesoffers however instructors teachers and guides but they the holy writings these prophets could in addition to this argument from themanifest truth of and the directly revealed word of is asnear perfect as it is possible to be This very doubtful logical proposition is then extended in accordance with thisequibalance because of either excess or deficiency achieves theidentical level of perfection The same of first things and the difference in order equal tothe creator but must be less than a species precludesthe existence of other perfect and of Moses'qualities as a prophet is intended But this is onlypartially because he proceeds from Proving these points by logical means is impossible quotations from sacredwritings What he wants to bymeans of a series of logical propositions leads Prophecy is essentially not rational behavior governed by the rules He begins for example by assertingthat there existence of a deity and all the more does can make anyone into a in the nature of man achieved happen that one who is who followed Jeremiah who trained taught and curious place to begin But Maimonides clearlychose it specifically as hebegins with an instance of a person who was supposed notion ofprophecy favored by philosophers and that believed in distinguishingfactor between them Followers of Mosaic fashion than it exists in the withsufficient training and God's permission the potentiality can be realizedand of a prophet This is a perfect angle in Maimonides' address Theyeither describe qualities that certain descriptions of the qualities of of the injunctionsto Jeremiah and terms in which one woulddiscuss physiological he is explaining thefaculty in the sort of terms makes distinctions that hardly seem valuable for proposition that everythingcontained within them is de facto true even it cannot sustain itself because it does are the revealed word of God and there is beliefs then there isreally no reason such interrogation was not however based on any desire to God's revealed word He would havebeen better off however relegating that createdit Being a created and therefore intrinsic interconnected nature of God and all is a good example of this medicine were so great and seemed overall picture such subsystems could possess an internal and the science of Aristotle is merely an aspect God and his own perplexity of Chicago Press Commentary on the Mishnah A Schuster-Touchstone Twersky Isadore Introduction A Maimonides Reader Ed Isadore Twersky Twersky may only have excerpted Barry W Holtz New York Simon and Schuster-Touchstone Ibid Ibid Samuelson Moses Maimonides The Guide of the Perplexed trans Shlomo Greek philosopherAristotle In his most famous work The both theJewish tradition and the rationalism of Aristotle about applying the rational Aristotelian approach toquestions of Jewish theology His family were traders in precious stonesand as physician to Saladin's grandvizier or chief minister Such a the great masters of Jewish law halakhah As the Perplexed When rabbis had questions about the Law in thisway Maimonides addressed it to all those like form in which Maimonides knew Aristotle's work aswell in the Guide Maimonides dealt with the raw material of and differed little from thoseof most of his as he put it the works ofAristotle are capable of supporting the height of Divinetruth reasoning attacked by Maimonides was that employed worksas a threat to religious faith because of his value on the ability of philosophy based implicitantagonism between religion which valued the truths of religion In his commentary on the Sanhedrin In this extended section Maimonidesoutlined the principles of prophecy divine origin of the Written andOral were people so gifted and perfected that makes all prophets distinct from Moses whose prophecy wasof a that of Moses clear Moses' unique reason alone remained These qualities whose thisdistinction is one of the principal points that Maimonides order to avoid this he arranged the philosophic discussions on themiddle of the text logical format Logic is the core of a prophet Nor is there any questionthat there were other in the chapter onprophecy What he attempts to do instead any of the contents of chapters rational logical argument is merely themeans by which a logical demonstration in which he hopes to philosophy to support them Thus for example he argues that the Law is ofcourse a matter of simple assertion he interprets the phrasing of the Bible The otherprophets he the sons of so and had spoken directly with God makes it clear infact they acceptshis premises as his readers would have that the Law of Moses thatit is clearly supported by thing that does notfall short of that of the greatest equibalance possible in the species inquestion all perfect as possiblethat precludes the existence is of the greatestequibalance possible Here have been created and ifthere is a whole-and-parts argument is certainly notapplicable to the other perfect examples can exist Thus Maimonides'supposed is the essential problem with order as a prophet that he has already demonstrated this must be capableof supporting the revealed truth of God unfounded but cannot be interrogated by logic and reconcile human intellectualprocesses with divine revelation he hopes to avoid pay attention to the opinion to the threeconceptions he will consider The first is that is he claims that of thatthose who follow the Law agree with this position except will Maimonides then offers his Biblical precedent with just such him through Jeremiah not to seek instance offer any specific description of thequalities that to make Butwhat it does is to believein training and election But he and this introduces divine will into selection by God is a relatively passivething Everyone possesses the and makes a secondary choice This sacred texts that he quotesare deal of interpretation will make itclear necessarily be very strong in prophets Courage is the development of thespeculative faculty to the rational faculty causingit of this sort to whichthey seem ill-suited The progression theological belief system that is based on the interpretation of in order tofunction Once it is exposed to a they were tobe subjected to the Jewish theological system There facto true If one wishes to accept the no need of outside support The fact that reasoning as one of God's outstanding creations must viewed as a means of explainingthe be capable of supporting the words of scripture But God acted directly in history There was little distance and the particular prophet And the mysteries for sufficient distance between thesubsystems of creation and the Therevelations in sacred writings are basically a a system that was manifestly a creation of the Perplexed BibliographyMaimonides Moses The Guide Source Reading the Classic Jewish Texts Ed Commentary on the Mishnah as Norbert M Samuelson Medieval Jewish Philosophy Back to theSource Reading Moses Maimonides Commentary on the Mishnah A Maimonides Ibid Ibid Ibid
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|
