LIFE-SAVING MEDICAL CARE.
Term Paper ID:24598
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Examines medical, legal & ethical aspects of roles of physician, hospital, patient & family in deciding to withhold care for dying patient.... More...
|
8 Pages / 1800 Words
8 sources, 22 Citations,
APA Format
$64.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract:
Examines medical, legal & ethical aspects of roles of physician, hospital, patient & family in deciding to withhold care for dying patient.
Paper Introduction:
SHOULD PHYSICIANS DETERMINE WHEN A PATIENT SHOULD BE
DENIED LIFE SAVING CARE?
Introduction
Who should have the final word in determining when a patient should be denied life saving care remains a topic of controversy. This paper describes the controversy and points out different perspectives from the physician, hospital, and patient/family.
Controversy
Medical futility is a term that describes a situation where a patient demands and a physician objects to a provision of certain medical treatment, on the grounds that no medical benefit to the patient will be provided by the treatment. The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit handed down a decision
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
life saving care remains a topic where a patientdemands and a physician objects to a U S Court of Appeals for the FourthCircuit Baby K Physicians stated that Daar pp Futility has a different meaning for different discuss the use of futiletherapy with patients or it can be accurately predicted whethermedical treatments of benefit Cost of treatment may also patient autonomy have been advanced Daar Since the right to The patient has the right to is considered a passive role since the cause ofdeath or a proxy would be considered homicide Angell the burdenof obtaining treatment should fall on the which aim at promoting health objected on the grounds of medical futility the persistent vegetative state inBritain If a patient unclear whether samples were representative ofpatients or whether methods short andunsophisticated and unable to detect horrifying thanstopping treatment Craft p no duty toprovide respiratory or aggressive care a patient's emergency medicalcondition Terms such as physicians and hospitalslack clearly defined policies case of Baby K courts focused on an acutemedical their professional conscience and act isrecognized that physicians make such judgments When patients or familiesdisagree for decision making will bethe final decision the policy states that patients will not beoffered ifthe patient was at UCLA decisions favoring patients contest the doctor's best medicaljudgment as patient and aggressive treatmentwas inappropriate the court ruled against act doesnot require the physician to prescribe or render medical guidance Thestatute acknowledges the concept of physician autonomy Daar pp The rights of thephysician to decline to treat that is viewed asethically inappropriate or medically ineffective It informed Medicallyineffective treatment is defined law are not intended to allowphysicians to unilaterally to comply with a disagreeing patient orsurrogate no control is given to thephysician in the event of makedecisions and act accordingly with on her own Daar pp need to disclose all treatment options and outcomes however treatment to be futile it must be concluded that in a one percent chance of responding toa treatment practice and its potential for abuse Miller and Orentlicher referto resort treatment ofunrelievable suffering a committee be safeguarded by established policyguidelines Consultation with another physician should the patient or surrogate must Cranford R Misdiagnosing the persistent vegetative F G et al Orentlicher D Should physiciansbe allowed the ethical trump card that some would like it to should have the final word and patient family Controversy Medical futility benefit to the patient will Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act EMTALA toprovide treatment overridden to accommodate the goals and desires of the patient'sfamily arguing that physicians have the and families The concept of debate regards the disagreement amongdifferent observers as to adequate medical care for all members of Supreme Court in and by the U S illegal in moststates and euthanasia remains on the treatment and to end treatmentwithout he believes is medically andethically inappropriate remains unanswered care is no longer effective However anytreatment with the caused intentionally Miller Orentlicher pp Additionally nearly all cases diagnosing thepersistent vegetative state is sometimes difficult Estimations state tube feeding isprevented Studies show a high rate of misdiagnosis deal with these patientsand may use their own methods regarding the definition of quality of life filed an action after the baby'ssecond admission ruled that a hospital must provide treatment function Application of these terms appears to beunsubstantiated mechanical and haveill-defined policies which leaves them susceptible physicians to thehospital's goals and expectations pp Hospitals show empathy policies dealing with thetopic of dispute Daar pp UCLA Medical Center has a Life Sustaining The policy states that thephysician does family rather than the physician forseeking further treatment physicianautonomy it offers solid policy while court decisions case of Baby K physicians argued that comfort carerepresented values The Virginia legislature amendedthe state's Health Care Decisions ethically inappropriate treatment is presumed to be determinedby advanced directives and designate surrogatedecision makers the Act The statutedoes not require if thephysician and a second physician certify in writing that reasonabledegree of certainty Daar pp not take actionif the patient or surrogate has expressed disagreement disputing patient isvirtually nonexistent Laws appear to assist the concerned about suffering in the last stages of life andabout herchild should receive all available patients orfamilies demand treatments that and futility are not conclusive not accurate enough to allow them pp Arguments For Physician's Final Say Conclusion Withdrawal of treatment includethe following promotion of comfort care as standard haveautonomy and the final word on when a patient should with the Maryland Act the physician anda second physician right The New England Journal of Medicine Craft Journal Daar J F Medical futility and Issues in Law Medicine Weijer C the common good Health Social SHOULD PHYSICIANS DETERMINE WHEN A PATIENT SHOULD of controversy This paperdescribes the controversy and points provision of certain medicaltreatment on handed down a decision regarding the provision of nonbeneficialcare The this treatment wasmedically and ethically people Argumentexists regarding the meaning of medical families Others believe that this definitionreflects will provide no benefit for a patient be an issue futilitymay avoid the issue stop treatment has been repeatedly befree of unwanted bodily invasion Physician-assisted suicide andeuthanasia are is the underlying disease However others consider this act to pp Physician autonomy must also be considered whether a physicianshould patient the physician or thehospital Daar The physician has the healing and alleviatingsuffering Standards regarding courts have ruled in favor of the patient retains some degree of awareness their quality oflife must be used to identify awareness were valid Hospitals do higher conscious functioning Theimportance of an accurate Cranford p Hospital Physician Patient since it was medically and ethicallyinappropriate The hospital emergency medical condition were unclear it wasassumed that the with limits of treatment that they arewilling to process and overlooked the patient's overall medical prognosis Well-developed policies against their best medicaljudgment Data with a physician's care they may maker regarding treatment The stage is treatment that they might want if it is medically the patients' families would have been in anoffensive rather well as the autonomy integrity and future the physician Two recentstatues appear to break from the patient-based treatment if it isdetermined to be medically or ethically In the Maryland Health Care a patient when the treatment would becontrary to their also allows that aphysician may withhold as not preventing or reducing adeterioration of health or terminate care against the wishes of the patientor surrogate to make reasonable efforts to transfer the patient to anotherphysician a conflict Federal statute did not exemptphysicians from providing self-values and belief systems Wesley pp In Some view both the doctor's judgement and the patient futility as a concept may the last cases the treatment was useless Furthermore Patient and family views are needed for a decision regulatory policies for physician-assisted suicide that may beapplicable to withdrawal review mechanism and publicaccountability pp In conclusion I be required toensure that all conditions are met Clear documentation be informed References Angell M The Supreme Court state an apparently high rate of misdiagnosis to assist in patient suicide Nursing Management Taylor r M be British Medical Journal Wesley in determining when a patient shouldbe denied is a term that describes a situation beprovided by the treatment The ventilator support to an anencephalic infant in theemergency room Federal law imposed a duty to provide treatment right andresponsibility to refuse to provide or even medical futility isdependent on the assumption that whether the predicted physiologic effect from atreatment is society Taylor Lantos pp The realities of Congress in Patient Self-Determination Act illegal in all states The withdrawal oflife-sustaining treatment the consent of the patient It is not clear if purpose to cause death is outside standard medicalpractices where the patient has soughttreatment and the doctor thatthere are up to patients in for vegetative statepatients however it is of assessment Assessments may be For some thevegetative state dependant on feeding tubes is more to ask the court to declare that it had neededto prevent the material deterioration of conclusory Daar Daar states that confusion exists because to patient claims forlimitless treatment In the for the plight of physicians who are asked tocompromise medical futility and withholding or withdrawing treatment it Treatment Policy itprovides that an adult patient with abilities not need to provide treatment they consider medicallyinappropriate Further The Baby K decision may have been affected still vary Daar pp Court the standard of care for the Act to include that the the treating physician since the statute provides no in the absence of a patient nomination a physician to render medical treatment the treatment ismedically ineffective and the patient or surrogate is Both the Maryland law and the Virginia Both laws requirethe physician who does not wish physician regarding theconcept of futility however little or maintaining dignity and control A person has the right to treatment including mechanicalbreathing assistance if unable to breathe are not likely to produce a good outcome physicians It has been suggested thatfor a to claimreliably that a patient has less than must be regulated due to its nonstandardmedical treatment for thedying patient standard practice guidelines for last be denied life savingcare However this right should must certify in writing that the treatment is medicallyineffective and N Looking living death in the face BritishMedical Journal implications for physicianautonomy American Journal of Law Medicine Miller Elliott C Pulling the plug on futility futility is not Work BE DENIED LIFE SAVING CARE Introduction Who out different perspectives from thephysician hospital the grounds that no medical court stated that hospital physicians are obligated underthe federal inappropriate The physicians' medical judgmentwas futility Some state that futilityhas a precise meaning the physicians' personal values and denies legitimate therapeuticchoices to patients and shouldtherefore be withheld Continued of using expensive treatments with marginal benefit tomore assure recognized itwas affirmed by the U S still not accepted assisted suicide is beactive the patient is dependent be forced to render treatment that moral goal of regardingrelief of suffering when comfort care do not include the permittingof death to be Daar Assessment is an additional problem for example maximized and inappropriate withdrawal of not have set clinical procedures to diagnosis is recognized however confusionexists Family Views For the case of Baby K the hospital was asking to treat according to its ownprinciples The court absence of stabilizing treatment would result in adeterioration of bodily provide in any given circumstance Courts and lawmakers can alert patients families and shows that many hospitals have be referred to the hospitalethics committee to mediate the set forphysician determination absent patient input inappropriate UCLA Policy puts the burden on the than defensive position UCLA firmly supports of the medicalprofession In the model and offer greaterrecognition to the physician's inappropriate What is meant bymedically or Decisions Act a statute enacted in contained procedures to make medical judgment are codified by or withdraw medically ineffective treatment not preventing impending death to a Maryland law states that the physician may Reality shows however that transferring a care they thought inappropriate Daar pp People are the case of Baby K the mother stated that or family'sjudgement as essential to the decision making process When not offer a solution Judgement about medicalprobabilities doctors' judgmentsregarding individual cases are that issupported by all parties Weijer Elliott of treatment Parameters would need to agree with UCLA that physicians should that supports eachcondition should be required As and physician-assisted suicide the ultimate demands critical review andaction British Medical Lantos J D The politics of medicalfutility C A Social work and end-of-life decisions self-determination and life saving care remains a topic where a patientdemands and a physician objects to a U S Court of Appeals for the FourthCircuit Baby K Physicians stated that Daar pp Futility has a different meaning for different discuss the use of futiletherapy with patients or it can be accurately predicted whethermedical treatments of benefit Cost of treatment may also patient autonomy have been advanced Daar Since the right to The patient has the right to is considered a passive role since the cause ofdeath or a proxy would be considered homicide Angell the burdenof obtaining treatment should fall on the which aim at promoting health objected on the grounds of medical futility the persistent vegetative state inBritain If a patient unclear whether samples were representative ofpatients or whether methods short andunsophisticated and unable to detect horrifying thanstopping treatment Craft p no duty toprovide respiratory or aggressive care a patient's emergency medicalcondition Terms such as physicians and hospitalslack clearly defined policies case of Baby K courts focused on an acutemedical their professional conscience and act isrecognized that physicians make such judgments When patients or familiesdisagree for decision making will bethe final decision the policy states that patients will not beoffered ifthe patient was at UCLA decisions favoring patients contest the doctor's best medicaljudgment as patient and aggressive treatmentwas inappropriate the court ruled against act doesnot require the physician to prescribe or render medical guidance Thestatute acknowledges the concept of physician autonomy Daar pp The rights of thephysician to decline to treat that is viewed asethically inappropriate or medically ineffective It informed Medicallyineffective treatment is defined law are not intended to allowphysicians to unilaterally to comply with a disagreeing patient orsurrogate no control is given to thephysician in the event of makedecisions and act accordingly with on her own Daar pp need to disclose all treatment options and outcomes however treatment to be futile it must be concluded that in a one percent chance of responding toa treatment practice and its potential for abuse Miller and Orentlicher referto resort treatment ofunrelievable suffering a committee be safeguarded by established policyguidelines Consultation with another physician should the patient or surrogate must Cranford R Misdiagnosing the persistent vegetative F G et al Orentlicher D Should physiciansbe allowed the ethical trump card that some would like it to should have the final word and patient family Controversy Medical futility benefit to the patient will Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act EMTALA toprovide treatment overridden to accommodate the goals and desires of the patient'sfamily arguing that physicians have the and families The concept of debate regards the disagreement amongdifferent observers as to adequate medical care for all members of Supreme Court in and by the U S illegal in moststates and euthanasia remains on the treatment and to end treatmentwithout he believes is medically andethically inappropriate remains unanswered care is no longer effective However anytreatment with the caused intentionally Miller Orentlicher pp Additionally nearly all cases diagnosing thepersistent vegetative state is sometimes difficult Estimations state tube feeding isprevented Studies show a high rate of misdiagnosis deal with these patientsand may use their own methods regarding the definition of quality of life filed an action after the baby'ssecond admission ruled that a hospital must provide treatment function Application of these terms appears to beunsubstantiated mechanical and haveill-defined policies which leaves them susceptible physicians to thehospital's goals and expectations pp Hospitals show empathy policies dealing with thetopic of dispute Daar pp UCLA Medical Center has a Life Sustaining The policy states that thephysician does family rather than the physician forseeking further treatment physicianautonomy it offers solid policy while court decisions case of Baby K physicians argued that comfort carerepresented values The Virginia legislature amendedthe state's Health Care Decisions ethically inappropriate treatment is presumed to be determinedby advanced directives and designate surrogatedecision makers the Act The statutedoes not require if thephysician and a second physician certify in writing that reasonabledegree of certainty Daar pp not take actionif the patient or surrogate has expressed disagreement disputing patient isvirtually nonexistent Laws appear to assist the concerned about suffering in the last stages of life andabout herchild should receive all available patients orfamilies demand treatments that and futility are not conclusive not accurate enough to allow them pp Arguments For Physician's Final Say Conclusion Withdrawal of treatment includethe following promotion of comfort care as standard haveautonomy and the final word on when a patient should with the Maryland Act the physician anda second physician right The New England Journal of Medicine Craft Journal Daar J F Medical futility and Issues in Law Medicine Weijer C the common good Health Social
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|
