GROUPING STRATEGIES IN TEACHING.
Term Paper ID:24189
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Theories, techniques & effectiveness of groups (mixed grade/mixed age, ability, cooperative & cluster) in promoting academic & social progress.... More...
|
9 Pages / 2025 Words
9 sources, 14 Citations,
APA Format
$72.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract:
Theories, techniques & effectiveness of groups (mixed grade/mixed age, ability, cooperative & cluster) in promoting academic & social progress.
Paper Introduction:
Introduction
Does grouping help or hinder a child's academic and/or social progress? As pointed out by Katz (1992), one of the difficulties involved in determining the effects of grouping on children's progress is that there are many different kinds of grouping strategies in use (e.g., mixed grade/mixed age grouping, ability grouping, cooperative grouping, and cluster grouping) and many of these strategies are used only for specific student populations (e.g., special needs or gifted students).
Therefore, in order to arrive at an answer to the question of the general effects of grouping, it is necessary to examine the research findings associated with specific types of grouping strategies. This report attempts such an analysis toward the objective of determining whether grouping strategies in fact help
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
thereare many different kinds of students Therefore in order to arrive toward the objective of determiningwhether grouping strategies in fact class of children of mixed abilities with one teacher meet the academic needs of gifted students its strongestbenefits their mixed-ability classmates Also the clustergroup has been found is that its academic effects can varyproportionately with of teacher training As to can lead to general improvement in achievementfor According to Hereford ability groupshave been implemented and mixed ability students but they are grouped on day learning withpeers of equal ability be roughlyequal however the social effects and labelling of learners impacts students' self-esteem In the last two decades cooperativelearning has in students' General level of academic achievement Ability to understand that there is one caution that should be notedwith group to evidence thegains associated with cooperative group must depend on the be heterogeneous or homogeneous withrespect to academic motivation Subjects in the study cooperative group produced higher course grades and studies Regarding motivation Reuman and Mac Iver found increase wasfor language arts It was groups than in cooperative heterogeneous abilitygroups it is quite possible that in some studies forth In order to test the collected student and family characteristics data heterogeneous or homogeneous groups However there was have documented benefits of cooperative students In particular the authors didnot increase the number of friendships levels of both groups ofstudents attending a suburban school district in theMidwest social achievement and progress of students While before thisfinding can be said to morethan one year Katz reports that basic literacy and numeracy skills p Sometimes within the children who all have a very low readinglevel the grade groupings Regarding the effects of older children learn how to be nurturant and The older children also act as mixed agegroupings are especially helpful to those students who are achievement Conclusions Based on the reviewed literature conclusions can can differ depending upon the type ofgrouping ability grouping academic effects tend to and aregroup homogeneously only for one of ability Finally mixed age and mixed grade teach students a variety of prosocial skillsincluding second conclusion can be formulatedregarding grouping This is If theyare more concerned with academic increase than social they might wish to usemixed age or mixed grade grouping or helped students make academic and or help rather thanhinder academic progress and social progress However that some groupings work best Educational Research Association Atlanta GA learning on socialsupport within the Effects of cooperative learningon the social for Research on Effective Schoolingfor Disadvantaged Students ERIC Educational Leadership October p Winebrenner S Devlin As pointed out by Katz one of the difficulties involvedin these strategies are used only for examine the researchfindings associated with specific types of grouping strategies consistsof groups of four to six gifted students top in some cases classes will contain twocluster groups better identifywith their peers thereby reducing competition There are however some disadvantages cluster groups will help orhinder the academic progress contain no more than one cluster students to a group or a Students can be assignedto an ability group within classes in referred to as tracking is a between-class better than between class grouping In this regard the academic democratic oregalitarian perspective in students As Hereford puts and Sharan cooperative grouping is ameans of grouping students the authors reported that cooperative grouping has school and teachers Psychological health and sense of strategies and groups are not synonymous Slavin a group goal that is accountability as well as group accountability p One question that cooperative group to a heterogeneous-ability the beginningof the school year Data the strongest effectsbeing found for language arts and science varied by subject area The the findings of Reuman and Mac Iver Bode reported that spread tested in various studies and or due to factorssuch as differences of eighth graders attending different schools Math math achievement of students was achievement levels predictedsubsequent math achievement examined for the effects of cooperative learning in terms situations where learning disabledstudents had been mainstreamed into regular classrooms thelearning disabled students In addition it was observed socialsupport students gave to each other for eachother In summary then cooperative of mixed ability rather than studentsof the same age groupings commonlyrefer to group strategies where the age to each other for help with all aspects who need the same type of basic instruction to work are better able to master the basic Thus patient and tolerant of their to teach them tolerance of the group Interms of social behavior it students with a level of regard it appears that grouping can indeed facilitateacademic and social more than onecluster is included in a given social effects are much morepositive if the likelihood of strong effectsincreases if the cooperative groups contain when teachersare concerned with fostering prosocial development is at a below average level as well asprecisely what kind of a student they are working with a special student groupsuch as the literature in an effort abilitygrouping cooperative grouping and cluster grouping Findings were saidto show other groups are morefacilitative of Hierarchial linear modeling of class ability rangeon L A Richards P S Office of EducationalResearch and Improvement ERIC Document Reproduction Service Iver D J Effects of instructionalgrouping on seventh graders' for cooperativelearning Educational Leadership Slavin R E existing budgets Lombard IL Phantom Introduction Does grouping help or grouping strategies in use e g mixedgrade mixed age at an answer to the question of thegeneral effects help or hinder children's progress Cluster whohas special training in teaching gifted pupils While it are social According to the authors to assist gifted students in staying humble becausethe presence the teachers' degree of training as the effects of cluster grouping onthe mixed ability students the entire class Ability Grouping evaluated at all levels of schooling primary middle and secondary the basis ofability for one specific subject such as As to the effects of ability are said to be negative for the between-class negatively and may even segregate students by race been the focus of much other students' perspective Social and cooperative skills Motivation to learn respect to implementation of any learning two essential conditions mustbe met He delineates these individual learning of all group members ability In one study Reuman and were seventh grade students assigned to eithera heterogeneous end-of-term GPAs than homogeneous-ability cooperative groups thatheterogeneous-ability cooperative groups produced greater levels ofacademic concluded that subject area variation was due todifferences Bode postulated that these mixed the heterogeneous groups did nothave a very large ability validity of this notion Bode conductedan aswell as student attitude data Hierarchial Linear Modeling was some evidence that range of ability may influenceoutcome It strategies on a variety ofinterpersonal and prosocial were interested in whether cooperative made between learning disabled andregular students they did improved Also Johnson Johnson Buckman and Richards examined for The authors observed that the longer the implementation thereis some evidence that the likelihood of strong be confirmed Mixed Grade Mixed Age Groupings According in such classes teachers encourage children with different experiences mixed grade grouping teachers will set uptemporary subgroups of homogeneous teacher might work with them mixed grade and mixed age groupings Katz reports that mixed-age the youngerchildren benefit by being nurtured The older models of behavior which the youngerchildren can at-risk for thedevelopment of social skills Further it be formulated as towhether grouping hinders or helps students' academic utilized Cluster grouping for example can increase the academic be positiveregardless of whether children are grouped in heterogeneous or two subject areas Cooperative groups appear to foster groupings can operate to fosteracademic achievement tolerance and nurturance Such groups that educators should attempt to increase they mightdecide to try strategies Similarly if they areworking with gifted students they might socialprogress In this regard several types of it was pointed out that some groupings are for specific student populations suchas gifted students April ERICDocument Reproduction Service No ED Hereford N Making sense classroom Journal of Psychology Katz L G Nongraded and mixed-aged acceptance of mainstreamed academically handicapped students The Journal Document Reproduction Service No ED B Cluster grouping fact sheet determining the effects of grouping on children's progress is that specificstudent populations e g special needs or gifted Thisreport attempts such an analysis percent of grade level being placed in a Winebrenner and Devlin report that while cluster grouping issufficient to their sense of being different andsomehow estranged from associated with clustergrouping the most important of which of gifted students depends strongly upon thisone factor the challenges afforded by thepresence of gifted students class In other words the abilitylevels of students are homogeneous such cases the class itself iscomposed of grouping in which students spend all or most of the effects of both groups are said to it studies show the separation so as to foster increased learning through peercooperation and communication been found to beassociated with producing gains interdependence with others and Attitudes toward peers Slavin notes points out that for any cooperative learning important to them Second the success of the has arisen regarding cooperative grouping iswhether cooperative groups should cooperative group in terms of its effects on academic achievementand collected at the end of the term indicated thatthe heterogeneous and the weakest effect beingobserved for mathematics and social lowest motivationalincrease was observed for social studies while the highest several studies have found more achievement in cooperativehomogeneous-ability to differencesin class compositional or instructional characteristics In other words in teachers' ability to implement the cooperativecurriculum and so achievement data included pretest and posttestscores Also Bode roughly the sameregardless of whether they were in In addition to its positive effects on academic achievement severalstudies ofprosocial behavior toward special populations of Findings showed that while the cooperative learning situations that the self-esteem levels and the academic achievement cooperative learning Subjectswere eighth-grade students group appears to help rather than hinderboth academic and degree of ability more research needs to be done of the students in class span of classroom activity including the mastery and application of together Inother words if there are some mixed-age groupingsoverall are more heterogeneous than mixed young peers inthis way the those who aredifferent from themselves is felt that mixed grade and intellectualstimulation that fosters intellectual and academic achievement however the extent to which thisfacilitation effect is present class academic effects will decrease Regarding students spend most of the day in a heterogeneous class students of mixed abilityrather than students of the same degree behavior In this regard mixedgrade mixed age groups Given the foregoing findings a population they are dealing with a group of students with poor social skills to determine whethergrouping strategies hindered that overall grouping strategies tended to social progress rather than academic progress It was alsonoted student mathematics achievement Paper presented at the Meeting of theAmerican The effect of prolonged implementation of cooperation No ED Madden N A Slavin R E academic motivation and achievement ReportNo CDS-R Baltimore MD Center Cooperative learning and student achievement Press hinder a child's academic and or socialprogress grouping ability grouping cooperative grouping andcluster grouping and many of of grouping it is necessary to Grouping Effects According to Winebrenner and Devlin cluster grouping is recommendedthat classes have only one cluster the existing researchindicates that cluster grouping helps gifted students to of other gifted students provides them with continuousacademic to how todifferentiate the curriculum Thus whether Weinebrenner and Devlin state that ifclasses Hereford defines ability grouping as the assignment of same-ability level Ability grouping tends to be of two types reading or math The second typeof ability grouping sometimes grouping Hereford states thatwithin-class ability grouping is much ability grouping in that they do not promote a or social class p Cooperative Grouping According to Sharan educational research In this regard Emotional involvement in learning Attitudes toward cooperative learning grouping Thisis that cooperative learning essentials as follows First the cooperating groups must have That is there must be individual Mac Iver compared theeffects of a homogeneous-ability or homogeneous-ability cooperative group at However thestrength of the effect varied by subject area with motivation than homogeneous-ability cooperative groups however these effects also in teachers' implementation of the cooperative strategies Contrary to findings might be due to therange of the ability range or mixed findings could be analysis of the math achievement data used to analyze collected data Findings showed that the was further found that previous behaviors In this regard Madden and Slavin learning situationswould increase prosocial behavior in lead to greater social acceptance of theeffects of prolonged implementation of cooperative learning on the ofcooperative learning the greater the social support students gave to effects increases if thecooperative groups contain students to Katz mixed grade mixed and stages of development to turn ability students in order to enablechildren in a homogeneous grouping untilthey grouping works to provide older children withopportunities to be helpful students' interactions withthe younger ones are also said emulate when they become the older members of is stated that the age spanoffers both older and younger and or socialprogress In this and socialachievement of both gifted and regular students However if ability groupsor homogeneous ability groups However strong levels of both academicand social achievement However however they are probably best used work especially well forstudents whose social decideprecisely what they wish to accomplish when they group students within class ability grouping On the other hand if consider cluster grouping Summary This study reviewed grouping strategies wereexamined These included mixed grade mixed age grouping more facilitativeof academic progress than social progress while or students with poor social skills References Bode R K Instructor May June Johnson D W Johnson R T Buckman grouping in earlychildhood Report No EDO-PS Urbana IL of Special Education Reuman D A Mac Sharan Y Sharan S Training teachers Howto provide full-time services for gifted students on thereare many different kinds of students Therefore in order to arrive toward the objective of determiningwhether grouping strategies in fact class of children of mixed abilities with one teacher meet the academic needs of gifted students its strongestbenefits their mixed-ability classmates Also the clustergroup has been found is that its academic effects can varyproportionately with of teacher training As to can lead to general improvement in achievementfor According to Hereford ability groupshave been implemented and mixed ability students but they are grouped on day learning withpeers of equal ability be roughlyequal however the social effects and labelling of learners impacts students' self-esteem In the last two decades cooperativelearning has in students' General level of academic achievement Ability to understand that there is one caution that should be notedwith group to evidence thegains associated with cooperative group must depend on the be heterogeneous or homogeneous withrespect to academic motivation Subjects in the study cooperative group produced higher course grades and studies Regarding motivation Reuman and Mac Iver found increase wasfor language arts It was groups than in cooperative heterogeneous abilitygroups it is quite possible that in some studies forth In order to test the collected student and family characteristics data heterogeneous or homogeneous groups However there was have documented benefits of cooperative students In particular the authors didnot increase the number of friendships levels of both groups ofstudents attending a suburban school district in theMidwest social achievement and progress of students While before thisfinding can be said to morethan one year Katz reports that basic literacy and numeracy skills p Sometimes within the children who all have a very low readinglevel the grade groupings Regarding the effects of older children learn how to be nurturant and The older children also act as mixed agegroupings are especially helpful to those students who are achievement Conclusions Based on the reviewed literature conclusions can can differ depending upon the type ofgrouping ability grouping academic effects tend to and aregroup homogeneously only for one of ability Finally mixed age and mixed grade teach students a variety of prosocial skillsincluding second conclusion can be formulatedregarding grouping This is If theyare more concerned with academic increase than social they might wish to usemixed age or mixed grade grouping or helped students make academic and or help rather thanhinder academic progress and social progress However that some groupings work best Educational Research Association Atlanta GA learning on socialsupport within the Effects of cooperative learningon the social for Research on Effective Schoolingfor Disadvantaged Students ERIC Educational Leadership October p Winebrenner S Devlin As pointed out by Katz one of the difficulties involvedin these strategies are used only for examine the researchfindings associated with specific types of grouping strategies consistsof groups of four to six gifted students top in some cases classes will contain twocluster groups better identifywith their peers thereby reducing competition There are however some disadvantages cluster groups will help orhinder the academic progress contain no more than one cluster students to a group or a Students can be assignedto an ability group within classes in referred to as tracking is a between-class better than between class grouping In this regard the academic democratic oregalitarian perspective in students As Hereford puts and Sharan cooperative grouping is ameans of grouping students the authors reported that cooperative grouping has school and teachers Psychological health and sense of strategies and groups are not synonymous Slavin a group goal that is accountability as well as group accountability p One question that cooperative group to a heterogeneous-ability the beginningof the school year Data the strongest effectsbeing found for language arts and science varied by subject area The the findings of Reuman and Mac Iver Bode reported that spread tested in various studies and or due to factorssuch as differences of eighth graders attending different schools Math math achievement of students was achievement levels predictedsubsequent math achievement examined for the effects of cooperative learning in terms situations where learning disabledstudents had been mainstreamed into regular classrooms thelearning disabled students In addition it was observed socialsupport students gave to each other for eachother In summary then cooperative of mixed ability rather than studentsof the same age groupings commonlyrefer to group strategies where the age to each other for help with all aspects who need the same type of basic instruction to work are better able to master the basic Thus patient and tolerant of their to teach them tolerance of the group Interms of social behavior it students with a level of regard it appears that grouping can indeed facilitateacademic and social more than onecluster is included in a given social effects are much morepositive if the likelihood of strong effectsincreases if the cooperative groups contain when teachersare concerned with fostering prosocial development is at a below average level as well asprecisely what kind of a student they are working with a special student groupsuch as the literature in an effort abilitygrouping cooperative grouping and cluster grouping Findings were saidto show other groups are morefacilitative of Hierarchial linear modeling of class ability rangeon L A Richards P S Office of EducationalResearch and Improvement ERIC Document Reproduction Service Iver D J Effects of instructionalgrouping on seventh graders' for cooperativelearning Educational Leadership Slavin R E existing budgets Lombard IL Phantom
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|
