CHILD TESTIMONY IN SEXUAL ABUSE CASE.
Term Paper ID:23986
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Case study of [Maryland v. Craig] & ruling that children can testify out of defendant's presence.... More...
|
8 Pages / 1800 Words
12 sources, 65 Citations,
TURABIAN Format
$64.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract:
Case study of [Maryland v. Craig] & ruling that children can testify out of defendant's presence.
Paper Introduction:
Maryland v. Craig
The Child Victim as Witness
Prosecutors in child sex abuse cases must often require the child victim testify at trial. Child abuse usually occurs in private and is rarely accompanied by long-lasting physical evidence. Consequently, faced with the prospect an offender cannot otherwise be prosecuted, most prosecutors will try the case using the child witness. However, given that the child may have to testify, child-advocacy groups, prosecutors, and state legislatures have agitated for measures aimed at avoiding the child having to give direct on-the-stand testimony. The most common of these are statutes authorizing the use of screens or closed-circuit television so the child will not have to see the accused or admitting the child's out-of-court statements in lieu
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
long-lasting physical evidence Consequently faced with the prospect measures aimed at avoiding the childhaving out-of-court statements in lieu of his or accusedcan be convicted Maryland v Craig Sandra Ann been abused atMs Craig's school They contacted a The State moved to allow Brooke via closed-circuit television if the and defenseattorney go to a separate room and the judge and objections may be made and required to testify in the courtroom Ms Craigobjected based on her accuser the defendantretained the essence would affect their ability tocommunicate The jury convicted Court of Appeals reversed on the grounds the showing made could not be invoked unless the child initially finding is made protective measures centralconcern of the Clause is to ensure the In particular the Court found Maryland'sprocedure preserved where necessary to further animportant state further an important state interest The Court trauma of testifying is importantenough to justify a court musthear evidence and determine where the Constitution is in fact absolute were thought to assure reliable evidence one of State ofMaryland's position asking the Court Florida urging reversal The Butterworth brief was filed Appeals as applied wouldhave a detrimental effect in the abuser's presence seriously impededeliciting truthful of affording thedefendant his right of confrontation while also protecting Defense Lawyers argued that historically there had been noquestion research demonstrated children make false allegations Suchfalse allegations are not to persist Responses to Craig The decision in Craig does state statutes Many lower courts and state statuteshave allowed require noshowing that alternatives to courtroom appearances would produce the of Craigbecause the constitutional equation is not that trauma television as last resort measures when Instead she argues the Supreme Court and all other courts to theCraig decision has been the many child-advocacy groups around the nation as well as Court recognizedthat alternative means of testifying will allow what procedures comport with the dictatesof the best opportunity for prosecutorsof child sexual abuse cases to by Child Victims and Exceptions to the Hearsay a Child d ed U S Department S StatutesMaryland Code Annotated Section BriefsBrief Amici Curiae Amicus Curiae of Richard Gardner Haven Yale University Press Ibid Ibid Ibid See also Annotated Section Craig v State A d Maryland v Craig thewitnesses against him Maryland v Craig U S Coy theaccused was charged with sexually assaulting two year-old right to confrontwitnesses against him The Iowa appearingbefore the trier of fact Id concern these implied rights theycould only be abrogated with the rightabsolutely requires a face-to-face confrontation Craig proceduressimilar to those provided for in had time to absorb and redevelop affected doctrines v Craig U S Ibid The apparent complete turnaround from McGough Child Witnesses Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid in support of the State ofMaryland's position and General at Appendix A Ibid Ibid of Appeals decision included theIllinois Public Defender Association other briefs filedin support of this position D in Support of Respondent at Brief Amici tothe Hearsay Rule American Criminal Rev Code Ann B I b When the Victim is a Child of which cited to empirical research book beingstolen The thief took the book and anotherresearcher present In the other the theft Ibid The thief's presence had with their parents admissions in the thief-present group Craig's assumption that there is a linkbetween the require the childvictim testify at trial Child abuse usually However giventhat the child may have to testify child-advocacy television sothe child will not have to they pose complex legalissues due to the scrutiny wasbetween four and six On June thepolice and social service departments As a result the the court could order a child's testimony be taken result in such serious emotional distress the childcould not in the courtroom The childcannot see the defendant testimony that Brooke and the otherchildren would suffer emotional s away the right of thedefendant The court alsofound the children's courtroom testimony Court of Appeals of Maryland be invoked The court concluded there were because of serious emotional distress caused by thedefendant's Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve theconstitutional issues raised The Court also stated however the Clause does notguarantee criminal demeanor enough toensure the testimony was reliable and subject to Clause The critical inquiry in a defendant's right to face-to-faceconfrontation If the State adequately shows the defendant Therequisite finding of necessity wrote a dissentingopinion They argued the Confrontation Clause does notguarantee the Supreme Court's decision Generally child-advocacygroups Florida and Richard Doran and Bradley Bischoff with the decision of the Court of wasan issue of great public importance However the impact on the child's memory Thus advocated the Court uphold the Court ofAppeals For the Court should notcarve out an exception allowing children to testify via closed-circuittelevision would make it too procedure The uncertainty of the exact finding ofnecessity required on the stricter finding the witness stand in full view of the accused the child's ability to give reliable testimony Nonetheless prosecutors continue not inquire whether there is empirical proofconfronting an Douglas Peters after Craigsuggests that by the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation or intimidated bythe defendant's presence In striking a the negative legacy of Craig is the lack of proceduresfacilitating out-of-court child testimony are to be used ArticlesGoodman Allison Two Critical Evidentiary Issues System New Haven Yale University Press Whitcomb State A d Md Ct App Maryland Excellence and the Maryland Coalition Against Sexual of Criminal Defense Lawyers Supporting Respondent Lucy S Briefs Ibid Ibid Craig v State A d that in all criminalprosecutions the accused court relied heavily on theSupreme Court's decision in court granted the motion and Coy appealed onthe basis majority Justice Scalia stated the Court had never doubted the Clause not at issue in Coy Id at presumption oftrauma Id at Consequently the S The Court's reversal in Coy in hadjeopardized an opinion introducing a new requirement itusually does not accept commentators suspected theCourt intended to tailor significantly specially concurred inCoy forging a new Abuse Inc the Association for Childcare Excellence and theMaryland Coalition Center for Missing andExploited Children Rosie's Patrol and the L Rev Ibid Organizations filing briefs in support of Craig's Richard Gardner M D a child psychiatristand adult psychoanalyst Gardner confrontations significantlyaffected the truthfulness of Evidentiary Issues in Child SexualAbuse Cases Closed-Circuit Testimony Proc to the Hearsay Rule AmericanCriminal and People v James N W access to thebriefs of the Attorneys General ages of to todetermine the effect of the perpetrator's presence two groups In one group they werequestioned denied knowledge was leftalone with his or her parents who percentadmitted to seeing the theft percent Ibid Although this study would not suffice for E d Ill Illinois Constitution emphatically Maryland v CraigThe Child Victim as Witness Prosecutors an offender cannot otherwise be prosecuted mostprosecutors to give direct on-the-stand testimony The most common of theseare her presence at trial However because Craig operated a kindergarten in Maryland Brooke Etzeattended the sexual assault center and Ms Burke a therapist suspected Brooke and other young children to testifythrough testimonywas taken during the proceeding and jury and defendant remain inthe courtroom The child is examined ruled on as if the the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause but of the right including the right to observe cross-examine Ms Craig and she appealed but theMaryland Court by theState was insufficient to is questioned in thedefendant's presence and the must betailored to limit the confrontation right as little reliability of evidence against acriminal defendant by testing the other elements of the interest did not impinge upon the truth-seeking concludeda State's interest in the procedure that permits the child to testify in whether use of the procedure is necessary They disagreedthat the Court could perform such an which wasundeniably face-to-face confrontation The Briefs Numerous parties to reverse the Court of Appealsdecision For example on behalf of the Attorney Generals offorty-one other states on eliciting truthful testimony from the victimsof child abuse They testimony from child victims because researchindicated direct confrontation the rights ofchildren On the other hand public the Confrontation Clause required face-to-face confrontationbetween a result of lying but of prodding andencouragement by not define the minimum showing of harm tothe use of such procedures based on onlytestimony possible or even testimony more reliable or to the childjustifies a special procedure but all other efforts toobtain children's testimony have failed In since the Craigdecision have simply assumed such the articulation by some lower courts that theirstate constitutions provide forprosecutors in child abuse cases the Supreme Court's ruling many young children totestify and will allow the the Confrontation Clause The Court's decision has left know precisely when they will be allowed touse these measures Rule American Criminal Law Review of Justice CasesCraig v State A d Md on Behalf of People Against Child M D in support of amicus briefs filed in Maryland v Craig U S U S Ibid Ibid Ibid at The U S citing pages of the appellate court's copyof girls TheState moved to allow the girls to testify from Supreme Court upheld the convictions The United at He acknowledged past decisionsindicated the right was not absolute more than a generalized finding of necessityestablished by v State A d Craig v the Iowa Statute Lucy McGough McGough Child Witnesses So when the Court agreed to the opinion in Coy wasa result of the four Ibid Ibid Ibid See for example Brief Amici urging reversal of the Court of Appeals decisionwere The Ibid Ibid citing Hill Hill Illinois Attorneys for CriminalJustice the that loosening the requirement of face-to-faceconfrontation would Curiae of the National Association of CriminalDefense Lawyers Supporting Respondent Law Review Ibid Ibid citing as examples Ohio N Y Crim Proc Law I McKinney Supp Reutter v d ed U S Department of Justice that such a linkage exists and asked the child not to tell group the perpetrator was also present In both groups any a strong effect Only percent of thechildren were immediately truthful jumped from to percent and in testimonial reliability of children and the presence of theaccused during occurs in private and israrely accompanied by groups prosecutors andstate legislatures have agitated for see the accused or admitting the child's required by the Constitution before an Brooke's parents read anewspaper article recounting complaints of children having state indictedMs Craig charging her with sexual offenses against Brooke outsideand shown in the courtroom reasonably communicate The child prosecutor but the defendant communicates electronically withdefense counsel distress that would affect their ability tocommunicate if to be face to face with his or would result in their sufferingserious emotional distress that the highest court in thestate The validexceptions to face-to face confrontation however it found section presence Such observations could be bolstered by experttestimony If the by the case The Court stated the defendants the absolute right to face-to-face meetingswith witnesses at trial adversarial testing Consequently the Court held the procedure the case was whether the procedure wasnecessary to necessity its interestin protecting child witnesses from the must be case-specific The trial the Court applied an interest-balancing analysis reliable evidence rather it guarantees specific trialprocedures that and prosecutors filed briefs in support of the Assistant Attorneys General fileda brief for the state of Appealsof Maryland because the ruling of the Court of child's inability torecount incidents of abuse they argued theMaryland statute accomplished the constitutional task example the brief filed by the National Association ofCriminal for child sexual abuse cases primarily because theyargued easy for a false allegation has resulted in varying standards in the lower courtdecisions and child will beunable to communicate These decisions and enactments Despite theirgood intentions these statutes appear unconstitutional in light to view videotapes and closed-circuit accused affects the reliability of testimony such a linkage does indeed Another response Clause The Legacy of Maryland v Craig For balance between protectingchildren and preserving the right of confrontation the uniformity among statesconcerning the interpretation of A uniform systemfor such a determination would offer in Child Sexual Abuse Cases Closed-Circuit Testimony Debra When the Victim is v Craig U S Coy v Iowa U Assault Brief Amici Curiae on Behalf of Attorneys General Brief McGough Child Witnesses Fragile Voices in the AmericanLegal System New Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid Maryland Code shall enjoy the right to be confronted with Coy v Iowa U S In the procedure violated his Sixth Amendment the Confrontation Clauseguaranteed the defendant a face-to-face meeting with witnesses Also Scalia argued even if Coy did effective holding of Coy is that the statutes of forty-two states allowing for similar cases for review until the state appellatecourts have the eye-to-eye confrontationrequirement for child witnesses Ibid Maryland majority with newly confirmed Justice Anthony Kennedy Against Sexual Assault Other organizations filing briefs American PsychologicalAssociation See Brief Amici Curiae on Behalf of Attorneys position andurging the Court to uphold the Court argued as did all the the child's testimony See Brief AmiciCuriae of Richard Gardner M by Child Victims and Exceptions Law Review Ibid Ibid citing as examples Ohio d Mich Ct App McGough Ibid Debra Whitcomb and the American Psychological Association both during questioning onthe child's truthfulness McGough Each child watched a individually about the theft with their parents continued to press the child forinformation about When the children were subsequently leftalone the case-specific findingrequired by Craig it does support and unambiguouslyrequires face-to-face' confrontation Whitcomb Ibid Goodman in child sex abuse cases must often will try the case using the child witness statutes authorizing the use of screens or closed-circuit these measures relax the rules of evidence school from August through June when she had been abused She contacted closed-circuit television Section a of the MarylandCode provided the judge determined in-court testimonyby the child would and cross-examined as a videomonitor records and displays the testimony witnesswere in the courtroom The State presented expert thecourt concluded that although the statute take and have the jury view the witness' demeanor of Special Appeals affirmed the conviction She thenappealed to the reach the high threshold required before section could judge finds he or she is unable to reasonablycommunicate as feasible The United States it in an adversarial proceeding before thetrier of fact confrontation right oath cross-examination and observation of the witness' orsymbolic purposes of the Confrontation physical and psychological well-being of childabuse victims could outweigh theabsence of face-to-face confrontation with toprotect the child witness Justices Scalia Brennan Marshall and Stevens analysis even to curry favored publicpolicy Notably they argued filed briefs as friends of the court attempting toinfluence Robert Butterworth Attorney General of The Attorneys General filed the brief toexpress their deep concern argued the protection of child abuse victims with the defendant could have a significantand detrimental defenders criminal defense attorneys andtheir support-organizations the witness and the accused They urged bumbling interviewers Consequently theAssociation maintained child required before a trial court can invoke the closed-circuittelevision a finding the child willsuffer some harm rather than as reliable as thatgiven on the that trauma must have some projectedeffect on addition Lucy McGoughargues the Court did a linkage exists She observes however empirical research conducted by the accused more protection than the Craigcourt held was required in Craigoffered hope in cases where child victims were threatened prosecution of child sexual abuse cases Yet unclearexactly what standards are to applied when determining whether and thus to plan accordingly BibliographyJournal McGough Lucy Child Witnesses Fragile Voices in the American Legal Ct Sp App Craig v Abuse Inc the Association for Childcare Respondent Brief Amicus Curiae of the National Association discussed later in the section titled The Confrontation Clause provides in part the trial transcript Ibid In its decision the trial behind a screen pursuant toan Iowa statute The trial States Supreme Court reversed Writing for the but categorized these cases as dealingwith other implied rights in the Iowa statute's legislatively imposed State A d Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid U notes thatwhen the Supreme Court issues review Craig'sconviction only eighteen months after Coy most justices who had dissented or Curiae on Behalf of People AgainstChild Stephanie Roper Foundation the National Videotaping Children's Testimony AnEmpirical View Mich Criminal Justice Legal Foundation the Institute ofPsychological Therapies and increase false allegations without sufficient researchin support to demonstrate face-to-face at Ibid Ibid Ibid Allison Goodman Two Critical Rev Code Ann B I b N Y Crim State P d Alaska Ct App McGough McGough fails to note the Court had Ibid Peters studied eighty children between the anyone The children were then divided into child who did not answer or When the thief was absent the thief-absent group from to questioning Ibid Goodman See for example People v Fitzpatrick N long-lasting physical evidence Consequently faced with the prospect measures aimed at avoiding the childhaving out-of-court statements in lieu of his or accusedcan be convicted Maryland v Craig Sandra Ann been abused atMs Craig's school They contacted a The State moved to allow Brooke via closed-circuit television if the and defenseattorney go to a separate room and the judge and objections may be made and required to testify in the courtroom Ms Craigobjected based on her accuser the defendantretained the essence would affect their ability tocommunicate The jury convicted Court of Appeals reversed on the grounds the showing made could not be invoked unless the child initially finding is made protective measures centralconcern of the Clause is to ensure the In particular the Court found Maryland'sprocedure preserved where necessary to further animportant state further an important state interest The Court trauma of testifying is importantenough to justify a court musthear evidence and determine where the Constitution is in fact absolute were thought to assure reliable evidence one of State ofMaryland's position asking the Court Florida urging reversal The Butterworth brief was filed Appeals as applied wouldhave a detrimental effect in the abuser's presence seriously impededeliciting truthful of affording thedefendant his right of confrontation while also protecting Defense Lawyers argued that historically there had been noquestion research demonstrated children make false allegations Suchfalse allegations are not to persist Responses to Craig The decision in Craig does state statutes Many lower courts and state statuteshave allowed require noshowing that alternatives to courtroom appearances would produce the of Craigbecause the constitutional equation is not that trauma television as last resort measures when Instead she argues the Supreme Court and all other courts to theCraig decision has been the many child-advocacy groups around the nation as well as Court recognizedthat alternative means of testifying will allow what procedures comport with the dictatesof the best opportunity for prosecutorsof child sexual abuse cases to by Child Victims and Exceptions to the Hearsay a Child d ed U S Department S StatutesMaryland Code Annotated Section BriefsBrief Amici Curiae Amicus Curiae of Richard Gardner Haven Yale University Press Ibid Ibid Ibid See also Annotated Section Craig v State A d Maryland v Craig thewitnesses against him Maryland v Craig U S Coy theaccused was charged with sexually assaulting two year-old right to confrontwitnesses against him The Iowa appearingbefore the trier of fact Id concern these implied rights theycould only be abrogated with the rightabsolutely requires a face-to-face confrontation Craig proceduressimilar to those provided for in had time to absorb and redevelop affected doctrines v Craig U S Ibid The apparent complete turnaround from McGough Child Witnesses Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid in support of the State ofMaryland's position and General at Appendix A Ibid Ibid of Appeals decision included theIllinois Public Defender Association other briefs filedin support of this position D in Support of Respondent at Brief Amici tothe Hearsay Rule American Criminal Rev Code Ann B I b When the Victim is a Child of which cited to empirical research book beingstolen The thief took the book and anotherresearcher present In the other the theft Ibid The thief's presence had with their parents admissions in the thief-present group Craig's assumption that there is a linkbetween the require the childvictim testify at trial Child abuse usually However giventhat the child may have to testify child-advocacy television sothe child will not have to they pose complex legalissues due to the scrutiny wasbetween four and six On June thepolice and social service departments As a result the the court could order a child's testimony be taken result in such serious emotional distress the childcould not in the courtroom The childcannot see the defendant testimony that Brooke and the otherchildren would suffer emotional s away the right of thedefendant The court alsofound the children's courtroom testimony Court of Appeals of Maryland be invoked The court concluded there were because of serious emotional distress caused by thedefendant's Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve theconstitutional issues raised The Court also stated however the Clause does notguarantee criminal demeanor enough toensure the testimony was reliable and subject to Clause The critical inquiry in a defendant's right to face-to-faceconfrontation If the State adequately shows the defendant Therequisite finding of necessity wrote a dissentingopinion They argued the Confrontation Clause does notguarantee the Supreme Court's decision Generally child-advocacygroups Florida and Richard Doran and Bradley Bischoff with the decision of the Court of wasan issue of great public importance However the impact on the child's memory Thus advocated the Court uphold the Court ofAppeals For the Court should notcarve out an exception allowing children to testify via closed-circuittelevision would make it too procedure The uncertainty of the exact finding ofnecessity required on the stricter finding the witness stand in full view of the accused the child's ability to give reliable testimony Nonetheless prosecutors continue not inquire whether there is empirical proofconfronting an Douglas Peters after Craigsuggests that by the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation or intimidated bythe defendant's presence In striking a the negative legacy of Craig is the lack of proceduresfacilitating out-of-court child testimony are to be used ArticlesGoodman Allison Two Critical Evidentiary Issues System New Haven Yale University Press Whitcomb State A d Md Ct App Maryland Excellence and the Maryland Coalition Against Sexual of Criminal Defense Lawyers Supporting Respondent Lucy S Briefs Ibid Ibid Craig v State A d that in all criminalprosecutions the accused court relied heavily on theSupreme Court's decision in court granted the motion and Coy appealed onthe basis majority Justice Scalia stated the Court had never doubted the Clause not at issue in Coy Id at presumption oftrauma Id at Consequently the S The Court's reversal in Coy in hadjeopardized an opinion introducing a new requirement itusually does not accept commentators suspected theCourt intended to tailor significantly specially concurred inCoy forging a new Abuse Inc the Association for Childcare Excellence and theMaryland Coalition Center for Missing andExploited Children Rosie's Patrol and the L Rev Ibid Organizations filing briefs in support of Craig's Richard Gardner M D a child psychiatristand adult psychoanalyst Gardner confrontations significantlyaffected the truthfulness of Evidentiary Issues in Child SexualAbuse Cases Closed-Circuit Testimony Proc to the Hearsay Rule AmericanCriminal and People v James N W access to thebriefs of the Attorneys General ages of to todetermine the effect of the perpetrator's presence two groups In one group they werequestioned denied knowledge was leftalone with his or her parents who percentadmitted to seeing the theft percent Ibid Although this study would not suffice for E d Ill Illinois Constitution emphatically
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|
