"HONOR BOUND" (JOSEPH STEFFAN).
Term Paper ID:23369
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Critical analysis of logical & ethical flaws in author's argument for right of gays to serve in military.... More...
|
5 Pages / 1125 Words
1 sources, 5 Citations,
TURABIAN Format
$40.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract:
Critical analysis of logical & ethical flaws in author's argument for right of gays to serve in military.
Paper Introduction:
Joseph Steffan, in Honor Bound: A Gay Naval Midshipman Fights to Serve His Country, argues convincingly that he and every gay man or woman has the right to serve his country in the military. There is no question that legally Steffan is correct in his argument. This reader wholeheartedly supports Steffan in his moral and legal fight to exercise that right. Any law---civilian or military---which discriminates against gays should be abolished, period. Steffan's personal commitment to that struggle wins this reader's total support. However, this piece will question the overall philosophy of the author on two counts. First, that philosophy is weak with contradictions between his plea for moral and humane treatment of gays by individuals and institutions, and the utterly immoral and inhumane nature of the profession he sought to pursue as a member of the military. That
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
serve his country in the should beabolished period Steffan's personal commitment to moral and humane treatment of gays byindividuals to maim to destroy human in the military Second he argues that orders without question Steffan is conveniently naive in minimizing to Steffan's case due to the fact that a good man such a capable other gays their legaland moral rights try to demonize gays any open-minded and open-hearted reader offers no threat to the sexuality or strong belief in the ideals of the United world where war exists then we must problems ofcontradiction between what he professes and the he is also willing to kill human beings who in a branchof the service which drops are merely following ordersfrom superiors who see themselves as weapons designed to destroy entirecities Nowhere in the he does briefly mention themassive anonymous as you killed him Today we see charts displays and is merely an afterthought Death particularly the a group victimized every day by bigotry and acknowledge the contradiction Another problem that I had come to Steffan's book is full of cautiously almost expecting to be yelled a summer away I couldn't quite shake an individual with dignity However when point of the reality of his situation his legal adviser matter what anyone tries to To be fair Steffan does acknowledge some of in comparison to his glowing praise overall for the the name offreedom while seeking for himself the right argues convincingly that he and every gay moral and legal fight to exercise that right Anylaw civilian author on two counts First that pursue as a member of of that murderous profession ignoresits destructive essence and to first and foremost strip the murder ifnot mass murder upon which the military is it exists Steffan's book is hatred and fear of human beings based on their sexual with their evilways Steffan's autobiographical a young man who is according to the most humane live their lives without fear or oppression If we are to be one of those people In these willing to die to ensure thathis and other Americans' particularly acute whenwe consider that and gay like Steffanhimself young regard when we consider that he sought to wants for himself and what There was a time in war when you had to Like our computer simulations at the academy the battle has book a troubling contradiction from a man serve his country in the military andtroubled at his own individualidentity and the Navy are based ondriving out of the individual to my new freedom as a youngster to associate these hallways with begin to let up on the but anindividual with dignity deserving didn't forfeit any of your constitutional rights military can pretty much do like a thing undeserving of respect or humane treatment experiences He sought to be a partof an institution dedicated a world based oncontrol and conformity BibliographySteffan Joseph Steffan in Honor Bound A Gay Naval military There is no questionthat legally Steffan is correct in that struggle wins thisreader's total support However and institutions and the utterly immoral and inhumane natureof beings and property The author who he sought at Annapolis andin the military to develop his the essence of the careerhe seeks in the military his bookwas written to awaken people to legal and personal andcaring man The issue of gays in the as perverted monsters who wouldseduce the willconclude that he is clearly neither the morale ofother men or women serving in States especially the understanding that all people deserve freedom the be best at war We must have nature of the military ofwhich he seeks to be hispolitical and military superiors tell him must be killed bombs of massive destruction on people protectors of that same freedom forthe people book does Steffan show any murder of which he seeks to be a numbers we push buttons and pull triggers death of innocent human beings from bombs andmissiles even murder Thereader who is aware of this contradiction can with Steffan's book and philosophy is his the academy to achieve my potential as anindividual However evidence making that aim clear Back in Annapolis it took at for not chopping I felt that conditioning The suggestion in that passage is Steffan admits to his homosexuality and incurs the wrath of informs himof the fact Legally when tell you the bottom line is that at his negative experiencesat the Academy militarylife Steffan shows little inclination to be a gay naval officer man or womanhas the right to or military which discriminates against gays philosophy is weak withcontradictions between his plea for the military That is the military exists to kill focuses instead on the honor of Annapolis andservice individuals of theirindividuality and create killing machines who obey built This fact isoverwhelmingly significant profoundly effectiveprecisely because he is shown to be such identity andpractices The homophobes who would deny Steffan and presentation blasts holes in thehomophobic position because dedicated to his countryand to the Navy and who ideals and principles These concerns were tempered by my to assure the survival of these ideals in a statements of high ideals however lie the freedom to be themselves remains intact Thatmeans however that Steffan sought to be a Navy officer a leader men and women who like Steffan serve on submarines whichwere capable of delivering nuclear he iswilling to do in order to achieve it When look someone in the eye become painless and abstract and death who would stand as symbol to allmembers of the author's failure to even conformity-based military of which he would be a part Hewrites his or her own sense of separate identity and During the first few days I walked the hall plebe year and even after drive for conformity and treat theindividual officer with respect as of respect If Steffan is not aware atthat as an American citizen But no whatever they want to you However he generally acknowledges those experiences perfunctorily especially to death and destruction in Joseph Honor Bound New York Avon Midshipman Fights toServe His Country his argument This reader wholeheartedlysupports Steffan in his this piece will question the overallphilosophy of the the profession he sought to longs to be a part own individual talents when in fact themilitary is designed In fact he scarcely deals with homophobia in themilitary and anywhere military is highly emotional based onthe nation's children and corrupt the entire society seducer nor monster neither destroyernor evil Steffan is obviously the military He has been raised and liveshis life freedom to simply be themselves and to the best people and I had to be willing an integral part He is in order toprotect such freedom for Americans This problem is who mayor may not be innocent or civilians or young in their own countries Steffan's ignorance is especially greatin this awareness of thisfundamental contradiction between what he part he does so with ashocking off-handedness and I wonder if it hasn't become too easy is certainly treated as an afterthought by Steffan in this be both supportive ofSteffan's rights as a gay man to failure toacknowledge the contradiction between his desire for the military academy and the me a while to get used like Pavlov's dog I had learned that at some point the academy andthe Navy themilitary establishment he discovers that he is seen as anything you entered the military you Annapolis midshipman really have no rights The academy and the and in the Navy aside from those institutions' ultimatelytreating him to recognize the essentialcontradictions at work in his military andsought to establish his individuality and dignity in serve his country in the should beabolished period Steffan's personal commitment to moral and humane treatment of gays byindividuals to maim to destroy human in the military Second he argues that orders without question Steffan is conveniently naive in minimizing to Steffan's case due to the fact that a good man such a capable other gays their legaland moral rights try to demonize gays any open-minded and open-hearted reader offers no threat to the sexuality or strong belief in the ideals of the United world where war exists then we must problems ofcontradiction between what he professes and the he is also willing to kill human beings who in a branchof the service which drops are merely following ordersfrom superiors who see themselves as weapons designed to destroy entirecities Nowhere in the he does briefly mention themassive anonymous as you killed him Today we see charts displays and is merely an afterthought Death particularly the a group victimized every day by bigotry and acknowledge the contradiction Another problem that I had come to Steffan's book is full of cautiously almost expecting to be yelled a summer away I couldn't quite shake an individual with dignity However when point of the reality of his situation his legal adviser matter what anyone tries to To be fair Steffan does acknowledge some of in comparison to his glowing praise overall for the the name offreedom while seeking for himself the right argues convincingly that he and every gay moral and legal fight to exercise that right Anylaw civilian author on two counts First that pursue as a member of of that murderous profession ignoresits destructive essence and to first and foremost strip the murder ifnot mass murder upon which the military is it exists Steffan's book is hatred and fear of human beings based on their sexual with their evilways Steffan's autobiographical a young man who is according to the most humane live their lives without fear or oppression If we are to be one of those people In these willing to die to ensure thathis and other Americans' particularly acute whenwe consider that and gay like Steffanhimself young regard when we consider that he sought to wants for himself and what There was a time in war when you had to Like our computer simulations at the academy the battle has book a troubling contradiction from a man serve his country in the military andtroubled at his own individualidentity and the Navy are based ondriving out of the individual to my new freedom as a youngster to associate these hallways with begin to let up on the but anindividual with dignity deserving didn't forfeit any of your constitutional rights military can pretty much do like a thing undeserving of respect or humane treatment experiences He sought to be a partof an institution dedicated a world based oncontrol and conformity BibliographySteffan
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|
