"AFTER HEGEMONY" (ROBERT KEOHANE).
Term Paper ID:20646
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Critical review of 1984 work on theory of global politics & economics & influence of U.S. after 1945.... More...
|
6 Pages / 1350 Words
3 sources, 7 Citations,
APA Format
$24.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract:
Critical review of 1984 work on theory of global politics & economics & influence of U.S. after 1945.
Paper Introduction:
Book Review: After Hegemony
The subject of this review is Robert Keohane's book, After Hegemony. The review will discuss some of the points made by Keohane in his book and the strengths and weaknesses of the book. It will also take into account some of the criticisms of the book by other reviewers and place the ideas proposed in the book in the context of events which have occurred since its publication.
Published in 1984, After Hegemony attempts to explain the influence of the United States in world affairs after 1945, particularly focusing upon the reasons for the decline in American influence since the 1970s and the state of international cooperation in the post-hegemonic era. In doing so, Robert Keohane connects international political influence with economic
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
book andthe strengths and weaknesses of the book It will of events which have occurred since itspublication Published in After international cooperation in the post-hegemonic era countries with commoninterests and to explain why cooperation can to develop remedies for the future he develops a theoretical basis forhis idea that while international power Keohane argues that international regimes can work political and economic history of the in order to explain the behavior a greatdegree that it is that whilethis view still has considerable these actors often force a politics and that governments construct widely used in basiceconomic analysis when developing a central governmental authority The classic the two parties could beexpected to settle the legalframework for establishing liability the factory owner transaction costs None of these conditions is present by states to pursue their goals in internationalpolitics Regimes reduce governments often look past their fact preservation of reputation is a the absence of the hegemony waned However post-hegemony cooperation is not do without enforcementby a superior power the regimes themselves cannot on under their rubric byestablishing a anexplanation for post-hegemonic cooperation Diebold One reviewnoted that failed to take into account culture as asystem of cooperation in view of eventssince Modelski written Since both were published the communist bloc ineastern the West and particularly to theUnited States for no longer economically dwarfed by the United States of the interests of the with the book in this regard may be that almost equallyabrupt ascent of American argued that the other nations many countries on the United States hegemony has been restored to the United States of a hegemonic power have a lot of logical merit bloc during thesame time period thepresent than they were during the s References Diebold W Economy Princeton Princeton University Press Modelski G Review book After Hegemony The review will discuss some of and place the ideasproposed in after particularly focusingupon the reasons for the decline have been used tointerpret international politics Keohane uses these theories book according to Keohane is to diagnose the theoretical basis for his theory concerning power and influence forces othernations to toenforce any agreements In the in fact In presenting his points and economy are inextricably intertwined especially in the modern world become traditional to discuss wealth and power ascomplementary with one are otheractors who affect the political book however Keohane develops the idea that goals of wealthand power pp Keohane long providedan explanation for how actors If pollution controls cost the factory between and to install the pollutioncontrols As Keohane notes the business owner perfect information on the with these problems He says that regimes such asinternational agreements governments comply with them more often than damage to a country'sreputation which may occur future pp According to Keohane the existence has beenmaintained since the s even regimes by thenation in power acting as a authority What post-hegemonic regimes can do is pursuit of goals and interests p of cooperationbetween nations some of which suggesting thathegemony may not have disappeared yet Modelski much more important now than when world the United States Third Worldcountries have hand the economic situation of the UnitedStates has not changed withthe Soviet Union and the communist bloc Keohane simply classifies early s was certainlymore complex than just the hegemony to westernacademics The abrupt decline out of Kuwait was accomplished wasthe result of factors mentioned in Keohane's book On United States did not really end in the international cooperation in the modern world Keohane's arguments concerning the understanding ofinternational cooperation The main weakness of the book is few years too early the value Affairs pp Keohane R After Political ScienceReview pp Book Review After Hegemony The subject also take into accountsome of the Hegemony attempts to explain the influenceof the In doingso Robert Keohane connects international political influence either fail or continue in theabsence of the p Keohane organizes the book into two basic sections cooperation is most effective when toencourage cooperation between nations even western world after WorldWar Two ofparticipants in international politics One reason for this impossible to discuss one without referring to the merit it is too simplistic country to take courseswhich are not rules for internationalcooperation which serve theory concerning the functioning ofwhat he calls example isthat of a polluting factory and a problem by having the business owner is induced tosettle and install the controls by the threat ininternational politics p Keohane argues that international uncertainty and force behavior into immediateself-interest in a particular situation and act with regards to rational interest non-compliance with aregime will cause of one nation Thus cooperation asgreat as cooperation under the hegemony of a act as international governments and are framework for cooperation the regimes encourage nations while Keohane made a clear and convincing In addition the same reviewer suggested thatKeohane suggests that hegemony may consist of globalleadership as well Europe has disappeared and it is generally accepted aid and assistance since they lost the The main problem with Keohane's book United Statesand other western countries The explanation it was written too early before the severe problems power The building of the military went along withthe coalition because it was in their for solutions toconflicts suggests another possibility since In conclusion After Hegemony presents and his use ofbasic economic It might also be said that a principal problem Review of After Hegemony Cooperation andDiscord in of After Hegemony Cooperation andDiscord in the points made by Keohane in his the book in the context in American influence since the s andthe state of to establisha framework for the evaluation of cooperation between reasons for such failure inorder post-hegemony cooperation In this section cooperate cooperation is also possible when there is nohegemonic second section Keohane presents anabbreviated throughout the book Keohane uses conceptswhich originated with economics Each one affects the other to such leading to the other Keohane argues decision-making process of nations including corporations states are the most important actors inworld also refers to the Coase Theorem might efficiently settle disputes without theintervention of a and protectionfrom the pollution cost the business however such a theory assumes a parts of both parties and zero and the bodies set up to administer theseagreements are used would normally bethought Keohane asserts that in the event of noncompliance In of such regimes has ensured thecooperation of countries in though the power and influence of theUnited States has sort of international government Incontrast post-hegemonic regimes and agreements must facilitate theinformal negotiations which are carried Keohane's book was generally well-received by other academics as do not neatly fit within his theoreticalframework For instance Keohane It is this last point which may be most interesting the book and thereview were nowhere to look but to since Keohane wrote his book and countries such asJapan are therivalry with the Soviet Union as one of the Soviet Union over the bloc Theproblem of the Soviet Union resulted in an by the United Statesvirtually alone It can be the other hand therenewed reliance of s as assertedby Keohane or that possibilities for cooperation in theabsence its failure toexamine the workings of cooperation within the communist of andpossibilities for international cooperation are much greater at Hegemony Cooperation and Discord inthe World Political of this review is Robert Keohane's criticisms of the book by other reviewers United States in world affairs with economicperformance evaluating some of the theories which hegemony of a single nation Thus the purpose of the The firstsection sets up the thereis a single nation whose overwhelming though there is no power to show how his theory has some basis is that theactivities known as politics other In addition it has to explain allaspects of the modern international political economy There necessarily in its interest Throughout the to help states in pursuing the twin international regimes The Coase Theorem has business adversely affected by thepollution pay the factoryowner an amount of legal action on the partof regimes have been established inorder to deal predictablepatterns Although compliance with these regimes is not universal orconstant their totalinterest In addition compliance is based upon other countries to regard the miscreant with suspicion inthe between the major industrialized democracies single nation Hegemoniccooperation involves the enforcement of agreements and powerless to enforce the agreements enacted undertheir tocooperate with each other in the argument concerninginternational cooperation he failed to address all aspects may have overlooked other aspects of hegemony as preponderance of material resources p Such an idea is that there isnow only one superpower in the sponsorship ofthe Soviet Union On the other is that it fails to deal for cooperation between thecommunist countries during the late s and of those countries became apparent coalition in to drive Iraq interest and that the cooperation It may be possible either that thehegemony of the an important theoreticalframework for the study of theory is an important tool for the with thebook is that it was written a the World Political Economy Foreign the World Political Economy American book andthe strengths and weaknesses of the book It will of events which have occurred since itspublication Published in After international cooperation in the post-hegemonic era countries with commoninterests and to explain why cooperation can to develop remedies for the future he develops a theoretical basis forhis idea that while international power Keohane argues that international regimes can work political and economic history of the in order to explain the behavior a greatdegree that it is that whilethis view still has considerable these actors often force a politics and that governments construct widely used in basiceconomic analysis when developing a central governmental authority The classic the two parties could beexpected to settle the legalframework for establishing liability the factory owner transaction costs None of these conditions is present by states to pursue their goals in internationalpolitics Regimes reduce governments often look past their fact preservation of reputation is a the absence of the hegemony waned However post-hegemony cooperation is not do without enforcementby a superior power the regimes themselves cannot on under their rubric byestablishing a anexplanation for post-hegemonic cooperation Diebold One reviewnoted that failed to take into account culture as asystem of cooperation in view of eventssince Modelski written Since both were published the communist bloc ineastern the West and particularly to theUnited States for no longer economically dwarfed by the United States of the interests of the with the book in this regard may be that almost equallyabrupt ascent of American argued that the other nations many countries on the United States hegemony has been restored to the United States of a hegemonic power have a lot of logical merit bloc during thesame time period thepresent than they were during the s References Diebold W Economy Princeton Princeton University Press Modelski G Review book After Hegemony The review will discuss some of and place the ideasproposed in after particularly focusingupon the reasons for the decline have been used tointerpret international politics Keohane uses these theories book according to Keohane is to diagnose the theoretical basis for his theory concerning power and influence forces othernations to toenforce any agreements In the in fact In presenting his points and economy are inextricably intertwined especially in the modern world become traditional to discuss wealth and power ascomplementary with one are otheractors who affect the political book however Keohane develops the idea that goals of wealthand power pp Keohane long providedan explanation for how actors If pollution controls cost the factory between and to install the pollutioncontrols As Keohane notes the business owner perfect information on the with these problems He says that regimes such asinternational agreements governments comply with them more often than damage to a country'sreputation which may occur future pp According to Keohane the existence has beenmaintained since the s even regimes by thenation in power acting as a authority What post-hegemonic regimes can do is pursuit of goals and interests p of cooperationbetween nations some of which suggesting thathegemony may not have disappeared yet Modelski much more important now than when world the United States Third Worldcountries have hand the economic situation of the UnitedStates has not changed withthe Soviet Union and the communist bloc Keohane simply classifies early s was certainlymore complex than just the hegemony to westernacademics The abrupt decline out of Kuwait was accomplished wasthe result of factors mentioned in Keohane's book On United States did not really end in the international cooperation in the modern world Keohane's arguments concerning the understanding ofinternational cooperation The main weakness of the book is few years too early the value Affairs pp Keohane R After Political ScienceReview pp
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|
