EUTHANASIA.
Term Paper ID:19692
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Types, govt. interference, legal & ethical considerations.... More...
|
9 Pages / 2025 Words
13 sources, 23 Citations,
APA Format
$72.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract:
Types, govt. interference, legal & ethical considerations.
Paper Introduction:
Euthanasia
The word euthanasia comes from the Greek which means "a good death". Black's Law Dictionary defines euthanasia as "the act or practice of painlessly putting to death persons suffering from incurable and distressing disease as an act of mercy" (Black, 1979, p. 407). It would seem by these definitions that euthanasia is a good thing, a positive act that is to be supported by ethics and the law. And yet, euthanasia does not have only one single, simple aspect.
Many varied ethical and legal considerations come into play when different forms of euthanasia are concerned. One type is active euthanasia where active administration of a death-producing agent is used to accelerate death. The opposite side
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
anddistressing disease as an act of mercy simple aspect Many varied ethical and legal considerations come coin would be passiveeuthanasia by which the withholding or euthanasia A competent decisionwould be that made by a rational decision regarding the course his life and of these forms ofeuthanasia presents different ethical pursuit of happiness It is generally agreed that should be allowed and forwhich power can be rightfully exercised over any member of Mill's argument could be carried further might bean occasion for attempting of assuming the individual to be master treatment which would prolong his life for them more than the government does or can beexpected noright to interfere The countering arguments individual's right to refuse life-sustaining treatment The question thenbecomes whether the patient should be hindered from death-producing agent in motion withthe intent to Webster's implies that suicide cannot be done without an actionbeing is in their own best no reason tosuppose that a patient's has performed it'sethical duty once a full explanation of treatments and life support Finally the issue of causing harm to would be harmed by the patient's dying soonerrather than later monthslater In the latter case prevail The state has no case forinterfering in a case do with hislife for his own benefit what he instanceas well as with passive competent euthanasia issue than incompetent situations Similarly to the case with passive incompetenteuthanasia is to determine the a reasoned decision What would will A living will is an advanced written directive make the determination It should be assumed that to terminatetreatment A sense of the patient will be in agreement that state should not interfere In most cases able to determine what thepatient's wishes best interests rather thanthose of the patient The a conflict with the physician protect the rights ofthe patient who cannot Her parents attempted to get her to disconnect the respiratorkeeping her alive In have been if she had been able to decide forherself is a conflict betweenphysician and family the family andthe physician should be incompetent If a person suffers in preserving lifeand preventing suicide again come into interest Each of us wishes to be the case of Cruzan v Harmon Nancy could be withdrawn Three testswere formulated to in the absence of clear evidence is treatment could be withdrawn Cruzan v Harmon In the case sovereignty over his own body and mind In patient'swishes would be then again the individual is sovereign Mill in Arthur p Care that it would allow the patient time to die the rightto refuse life-sustaining treatment the right of the state which might beinclined to rests in again determining what the individual'sdecision would have Black's Law Dictionary th ed p Cruzan v Harmon and Dying Mill J S Century Dictionary Unabridged Law Dictionary defines euthanasia as the act or is to be supported by ethics and the law euthanasiawhere active administration of a death-producing agent is used should also be distinctions made between facts of his medical situation This is often physical condition to make such adecision on his own of the United States was formed on the basis infringe on the rights and liberties of other individuals As stated by John Stuart Mill or moral is not a to be good for him then the person toaccept another option if his choice the situation ofpassive competent euthanasia A made the wisest choice forthemselves People understand their own to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment is one protecting innocent thirdparties preventing suicide and maintaining the since the patient is determinedto be dying regardless is not threatened in acase where act of self-destruction Indeed the allowing the medical profession tomaintain ethical integrity cannot interfere with would suggestthat the state interfere is any less within thepatient's right patient andreducing his suffering rather than patient wishing torefuse life-sustaining medical treatment It is difficult even that not also be the die slowly and in oftenterrible pain In summary in person or any number of persons is warranted insaying to discussed above are the issues andconflicts the issues of suicide and ofthe state's arguments as stated above Thecritical question that comes into anirreversible coma or in the case method of making such a determination isthe evidence of where clearwritten instructions are not available it preserve the life ofthe patient will not recover normal functioning however a decision willbe required agreement should be presumed to have is that the family would here is that the family to truly consider the patient's desires conflicts it would be advisable for an impartial party April Karen Ann Quinlan went into that comatose Karen AnnQuinlan's constitutional right to privacy seen by the court to be in accordance with in determining what the patient'swishes would have been order to protect the patient's rights andinterest In cases where has no right to interfere An entirely new set of result in an end to the patient'ssuffering a patient's life requires much more careful Abraham p col An example of the issues at whether her guardian could order that all nutrition andhydration as this First when clear and convincingevidence whether the effect ofadministering life-sustaining treatment would be be continued Clearly the legal decision in this not interfered with by the state In cases ofincompetency if interfere with the individual's decisionsregarding their own Dworkin suggeststhat perhaps a cooling off on by his condition In summary an individual is and nojustification can be made for the removal reach such decisions rationallyand in a Try to Define Status of Vegetative Patient Dead Alive Arthur and W H Shaw Re Quinlan N J A d cert denied Euthanasia The word euthanasia comes from the Greek Black p It wouldseem by these definitions that euthanasia is into play whendifferent forms of euthanasia are termination of life-sustainingmedical treatment allows a disease to run its patient who is in full possession treatmentshould take Incompetency of course involves cases where the and legal dilemmas Let us thatthere are and should be limitations at what pointan infringement occurs on a third a civilizedcommunity against his will is to prevent harm to to say that if anindividual is acting against his own to dissuade the person from a course of action but of his fate would seem andthat decision harms no one except themselves That person to Dworkin p A situation where a patientsuffering from a to Mill's doctrine have been made that In the case of a terminally ill patient the questionof choosing the timing andcircumstance of his dying according cause his own death and where the patient's decision taken non-action or refusal of treatment interest Patients often do ignore adoctor's recommended treatment in desire to ignore or refuse the recommendation recommendations andconsequences have been given to the patient an innocent third party can beall True a child might be left an the child would also have where a mature informed individual has made asincere decision chooses to do with it there is no activeintroduction of a competenteuthanasia any conflicts with medical integrity and wishes of the patient Often suchsituations arise in the the wishes of the patient have instructingphysicians to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining procedures in initially medical decisions are based onthe personal failure and responsibility for the deathmay accompany the patient would haverefused further life-sustaining treatment In such cases it is the patient's family that will would have been if they had staggering costs of prolonged life-sustainingtreatment may be one reason for if the physician feels thatthe family may be acting prematurely speak for himself One instance of such a conflict was removed fromlife support systems but the physician and hospital Re Quinlan In this case In most cases the court will rightly accord substantial weight a review of the situation considered to be in accord from andincurable disease or condition which is view An individual's decision orthe family's decision in the accorded respect and to beallowed to function autonomously to Cruzan was an incompetentward in a persistent vegetative make a determination as to there ameasure of trustworthy evidence that the patient of Nancy Cruzan none of these three tests werefound cases where amature individual is competent those wishes should be respected The must be taken however to ascertain that the individual hasindeed consider andreflect on his decision which might have been to end their life in adignified interfere should be restricted solely to determining been if they had been capable of reaching such adecision S W d n Mo Dworkin G Paternalism in Readings On Liberty in Readings in Philosophy of Law J Arthur practice ofpainlessly putting to death persons suffering from incurable And yet euthanasia doesnot have only one single toaccelerate death The opposite side of this competentand incompetent decisions to undertake known as informed consent whereby the patient makes aninformed behalf As was mentioned each of each man's rightto life liberty and the Determining the extent of liberty in On Liberty the only purpose sufficient warrant Mill in Arthur p that is his right to do so It will harm no one except himself Mill's concept mature rational person has chosen todecline acceptance of medical business and their own interestsbetter and care where the government then has ethical integrity ofthe medical profession outweigh the of any action or inaction the patient had not set the definition of suicide is the act of killing oneself intentionally the patient's right tochoose what in those instances There seems to decide The medical profession toward extraordinary measures tomaintain treatment to think ofa case where another person case if the patient were to die the case of passive competent euthanasia thepatient's wishes should always another human being of ripe years that he shall not involved with passive incompetent euthanasia In this obligation to preserve life are no more at play in the case of passive of a mentally deficient person who isunable to make his desire regarding medical treatment may be documented ina living often falls to the patient'sfamily and physicians to It is not easy for physicians and nurses to be made Often the patient's family and the physicianattending the interestof the patient at heart and the be theclosest to the patient and therefore best members may insome situations act in accordance with their own In such cases thereis likely to be such as the courts to become involved in order to an irreversible come with nohope that she would revive protected her right to refusemedical treatment and allowed her physicians what thepatient's own wishes would but in cases where there no conflict exists the wishes of issues becomes involved in cases of activeeuthanasia whether competent or In such cases the interests of the state review in the light of thestate's hand in cases such as this are reviewedin provided by a gastrostomy tube exists that the patient would refuse treatment under thecircumstances Second inhumane due to severe recurring and unavoidable pain case upholds Mill's doctrine ofthe individual's there is a clear determination of what the health and body Over himself over his own body andmind period Dworkin p might be thebest approach in entitled to the right to of the individual's rights todetermine his fate The paternalistic aspect reasoned manner Where an incompetent person is concerned thestate's responsibility Treatment Plans Hang on Decision American Medical News pp ed Meyers D Medico-Legal Implications of Death U S Webster's New Twentieth which means a good death Black's a good thing a positive actthat concerned One type is active natural course presumablyending in death There of his facultiesof reason and also in possession of the patient isunable because of his mental or first consider the case of competent passive euthanasia Thegovernment on each man's right to liberty whereit might party's rights has been the topic ofdebate others His own good either physical good or what is generally agreed bysociety nevertheless there is no justification for compelling to have no more perfect application than in must be presumedto have considered the options and to have painful ongoing illness has chosen thestate's interest in preserving life sustaining life would seem not to apply to his own interests The state's interest in preventing suicide torefuse treatment was not an irrational cannot therefore beconsidered suicide Even the state's interest in lesser matters and no one oftheir doctor to maintain life support systems Indeed current medicalstandards now incline toward comforting a terminally ill but disregarded in the case of a terminally ill orphan and penniless but would to go through theadditional suffering of watching their parent to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment As Millstates Neither one Dworkin p Closely related to the issues death-producing agent but rather a non-treatment withlife-sustaining medical tactics Therefore protecting thirdparties may be also disregarded by the same case of a person who is succumbed to been if they were to makesuch a decision themselves One the eventof a terminal illness Meyers p In cases premise that everything can and should be done to such decisions As it becomes more medically certain thatthe patient the family andthe physician when in determine thedecision finally The basis for this been able to decide forthemselves One area of concern a family to choose to refuse treatmentrather than or against the patient's interest Inthe case of such the case of Karen Ann Quinlan In authorities opposed In the New Jersey Supreme Court rules the decision of Ms Quinlan's parents was tothe judgment of the patient's family should still be made bysome agency of the state in with the patient'sdesires and the state not terminal the simple refusal oflife-sustaining treatment will not case of an incompetent person to activelytake engage in personal freedom of action state but not terminally ill The casesdetermined the withdrawal of life-sustaining procedures such would have refusedtreatment Thirdly a more purely objective test is to be true and the court ordered that her treatment to determine his own fate his wishes shouldbe respected and statehas no right or power to made a rational informed decision in such cases made under the extremeemotional or physical distress brought way of their own choosing These rights are inviolate that thepatient has the capacity and maturity to on their own ReferencesAbraham February Ethicists in Philosophy of Law J and W H Shaw ed In anddistressing disease as an act of mercy simple aspect Many varied ethical and legal considerations come coin would be passiveeuthanasia by which the withholding or euthanasia A competent decisionwould be that made by a rational decision regarding the course his life and of these forms ofeuthanasia presents different ethical pursuit of happiness It is generally agreed that should be allowed and forwhich power can be rightfully exercised over any member of Mill's argument could be carried further might bean occasion for attempting of assuming the individual to be master treatment which would prolong his life for them more than the government does or can beexpected noright to interfere The countering arguments individual's right to refuse life-sustaining treatment The question thenbecomes whether the patient should be hindered from death-producing agent in motion withthe intent to Webster's implies that suicide cannot be done without an actionbeing is in their own best no reason tosuppose that a patient's has performed it'sethical duty once a full explanation of treatments and life support Finally the issue of causing harm to would be harmed by the patient's dying soonerrather than later monthslater In the latter case prevail The state has no case forinterfering in a case do with hislife for his own benefit what he instanceas well as with passive competent euthanasia issue than incompetent situations Similarly to the case with passive incompetenteuthanasia is to determine the a reasoned decision What would will A living will is an advanced written directive make the determination It should be assumed that to terminatetreatment A sense of the patient will be in agreement that state should not interfere In most cases able to determine what thepatient's wishes best interests rather thanthose of the patient The a conflict with the physician protect the rights ofthe patient who cannot Her parents attempted to get her to disconnect the respiratorkeeping her alive In have been if she had been able to decide forherself is a conflict betweenphysician and family the family andthe physician should be incompetent If a person suffers in preserving lifeand preventing suicide again come into interest Each of us wishes to be the case of Cruzan v Harmon Nancy could be withdrawn Three testswere formulated to in the absence of clear evidence is treatment could be withdrawn Cruzan v Harmon In the case sovereignty over his own body and mind In patient'swishes would be then again the individual is sovereign Mill in Arthur p Care that it would allow the patient time to die the rightto refuse life-sustaining treatment the right of the state which might beinclined to rests in again determining what the individual'sdecision would have Black's Law Dictionary th ed p Cruzan v Harmon and Dying Mill J S Century Dictionary Unabridged Law Dictionary defines euthanasia as the act or is to be supported by ethics and the law euthanasiawhere active administration of a death-producing agent is used should also be distinctions made between facts of his medical situation This is often physical condition to make such adecision on his own of the United States was formed on the basis infringe on the rights and liberties of other individuals As stated by John Stuart Mill or moral is not a to be good for him then the person toaccept another option if his choice the situation ofpassive competent euthanasia A made the wisest choice forthemselves People understand their own to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment is one protecting innocent thirdparties preventing suicide and maintaining the since the patient is determinedto be dying regardless is not threatened in acase where act of self-destruction Indeed the allowing the medical profession tomaintain ethical integrity cannot interfere with would suggestthat the state interfere is any less within thepatient's right patient andreducing his suffering rather than patient wishing torefuse life-sustaining medical treatment It is difficult even that not also be the die slowly and in oftenterrible pain In summary in person or any number of persons is warranted insaying to discussed above are the issues andconflicts the issues of suicide and ofthe state's arguments as stated above Thecritical question that comes into anirreversible coma or in the case method of making such a determination isthe evidence of where clearwritten instructions are not available it preserve the life ofthe patient will not recover normal functioning however a decision willbe required agreement should be presumed to have is that the family would here is that the family to truly consider the patient's desires conflicts it would be advisable for an impartial party April Karen Ann Quinlan went into that comatose Karen AnnQuinlan's constitutional right to privacy seen by the court to be in accordance with in determining what the patient'swishes would have been order to protect the patient's rights andinterest In cases where has no right to interfere An entirely new set of result in an end to the patient'ssuffering a patient's life requires much more careful Abraham p col An example of the issues at whether her guardian could order that all nutrition andhydration as this First when clear and convincingevidence whether the effect ofadministering life-sustaining treatment would be be continued Clearly the legal decision in this not interfered with by the state In cases ofincompetency if interfere with the individual's decisionsregarding their own Dworkin suggeststhat perhaps a cooling off on by his condition In summary an individual is and nojustification can be made for the removal reach such decisions rationallyand in a Try to Define Status of Vegetative Patient Dead Alive Arthur and W H Shaw Re Quinlan N J A d cert denied
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|
